Suggestion for Housing problem

[Big_Bap]

lol.......

[Jojoya]

Someone actually shared with me numbers on how many single person FCs are out there per server. It is way lower then I would have guessed and interesting to see.

https://www.xivhousing.com/2021-census-solo-fc-housing

While it's relatively low compared to total houses, that's still several thousand houses that could be owned by players who don't currently have a house.

It's not a good precedent to say it's okay for some players to break the rules as long as not all players are doing it. What happens when more decide they belong in the group that gets to break the rules?

[Big_Bap]

While it's relatively low compared to total houses, that's still several thousand houses that could be owned by players who don't currently have a house.

It's not a good precedent to say it's okay for some players to break the rules as long as not all players are doing it. What happens when more decide they belong in the group that gets to break the rules?

Ah yes, there you go again

1: I still don't see you complain about personal houses being left unattended for months or even years (even though that's a much bigger issue in terms of volume).
2: What rules are being broken and if so, why is nobody being punished?

Just to remind you, it's been stated numerous times that the temporary restriction on FC housing ownership doesn't actually work. If the game allows you to purchase as many FC houses you want under the same service account, without relying on transferring ownership to a character on a separate service account, how in the world are you breaking any rules? Additionally, the information on that page is not present ingame...

This is not an exaggeration. Huge portions of the housing community are locked down by FC's with just one person

Someone actually shared with me numbers on how many single person FCs are out there per server. It is way lower then I would have guessed and interesting to see.

[Thorncraft]

Plot is relinquished [placard does state for Relocation or Sale during their respective phases] > Invisible 10-hour-timer starts for Relocation (that's 42% of a real day to decide). Once Relocation timer is up no more Relocation and the plot goes up for sale > next 0-4 hours that plot can not be bought (that is minimum of 58% of a real day to login and see there could potentially be a plot up, given the relocation goes unphased) > 4-12 hours the invisible timer starts (like the current one) > invisible timer goes off or after 12 hours > the plot goes up for insta-purchase. The minimum amount of turn around time would be 14 hours from relinquish to purchase with max being 26 hours. Relocation still gets priority but timers favor a buyer. Lastly, the knowledge of a rough buy window with only an 8 hour spam window is priceless. What do you think?