Quote Originally Posted by Forien View Post
You are all explaining why my alternatives are bad and I know they are bad. But they are better than current systems. They were/will be abused? Well, probably. Most likely, yeah. But will still be less frustrating and harmful to normal players.

You argue for botter. Sure, I will bite. Right now you can bot your way to buying a house as well. Just set up a bot to spam buttons faster than a human possibly can. Set up two or three bots. Same issue. The only result is health (including mental) loss for real players.

Current system doesn't fix anything. It still allows abuse as being seen, still promotes botters, while hurting normal players.

So yeah, from various alternatives that all allow abuse and botting, I will take one that impacts normal player less. And that's a system that does not require me or anyone else to camp for 20 hours without break to even have a chance.

And I see nothing wrong with having the richest have the houses. Houses are limited, they are meant to be luxury property. With proper enforcements of single plot for single FC/player and maybe minimum player number in FC required to even buy a land (right now it's only rank afaik), this would be fine. That's why I feel like both Auction and Raffle alternatives I provided have real chance to work out.
No it is horrible, above people explain it well, most of us have lived through the systems you show, and most of us know how it would work... your things may look good on the the paper, but the drought would end in hands of botting and RMT, and players wont be able to beat the bots, further more the PS4 and 5 players would be a huge disadvantage, as pretty much anyone who play on PC would be able to exploit it horrible.