Is it headcannon when I use the evidence from the game to form an opinion or make a judgment? Or does my conclusion just not agree with yours?Sounds like a whole lot of headcanon with little to no basis. We are given the short stories as well to further give proof of the superiority of the Ancients and their way of life. I suggest you go and read those stories so you can properly give actual info instead of headcanon/fanfiction. Ancients had to be sacrificed yes, the save the planet from dying in which case no one would be alive today. You equated it to beast tribes but they’ve never explained what kind of life it was outside of Venat’s small monologue. So again, no basis and just random headcanon and speculation. Limsa already did eradicate beast tribes for their survival so that’s already off the table. So it doesn’t really justify anything. Again, no one seems to be responding to when i say the fact that, the sundering causes more death than the rejoinings ever would. Everyone talks about the genocide of the rejoinings but never seems to want to address the genocide hydaelyn caused by sundering the world and multiplying death 14 times.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote

