Can we use ACT to recognize who is griefing the party and report them afterwards?

[LaylaTsarra]

oh so the matoya I did earlier where the whm used like 10 glares and never used a single holy throughout the whole dungeon wasn't real

I didn't say it doesn't happen. This is what I said.

And it's pretty rare to find a healer that doesn't dps. It's also not uncommon to find especially co-healers that don't heal and only dps.

You can go on about your experience it's fine but the fact of the matter is those healers are far and in between.

[Keramory]

If a GM seriously decides to ban me for using ACT I will go to Control Panel, search for FFXIV and uninstall. This is bs I am not putting up with. I really don't care about the reasons why the ToS is so poorly made. I will buy alpha for AoC and maybe put more hours into studying instead of playing.

... Did I read this right?

Threatening to uninstall AFTER being banned for breaking ToS is probably not as strong of a statement to SE that you think it is.

To be fair though, I've never been banned from a game. Maybe its common practice to keep your banned games installed as a reminder of what a bad noodle you were.

[Kuroka]

I didn't say it doesn't happen. This is what I said.

And it's pretty rare to find a healer that doesn't dps. It's also not uncommon to find especially co-healers that don't heal and only dps.

You can go on about your experience it's fine but the fact of the matter is those healers are far and in between.

Yes such fun wiping on diamond cause the healer things he doesnt need to heal at all lol...


Its even worse on PvP where you can acutally see on the end who did 0 dmg... I had this guy rolling dps but never doing ANY dmg at all... like.... dam leecher...

[SturmChurro]

I didn't say it doesn't happen. This is what I said.

And it's pretty rare to find a healer that doesn't dps. It's also not uncommon to find especially co-healers that don't heal and only dps.

You can go on about your experience it's fine but the fact of the matter is those healers are far and in between.

I don't know about that being a fact.

[Vahlnir]

I didn't say it doesn't happen. This is what I said.

And it's pretty rare to find a healer that doesn't dps. It's also not uncommon to find especially co-healers that don't heal and only dps.

You can go on about your experience it's fine but the fact of the matter is those healers are far and in between.

When I have any sort of issue with healers, it's usually because they are dpsing too much. Dying to easily avoidable mechanics is a close second though, and it's usually the ones that have already cleared the content they're in.

[Roeshel]

... Did I read this right?

Threatening to uninstall AFTER being banned for breaking ToS is probably not as strong of a statement to SE that you think it is.

To be fair though, I've never been banned from a game. Maybe its common practice to keep your banned games installed as a reminder of what a bad noodle you were.

Why would you consider this as a threat in the first place? A threat to what and to whom.

Threat - a statement of an intention to inflict pain, injury, damage, or other hostile action on someone in retribution for something done or not done.

I stated I will uninstall if X happened to me. I am inflicting pain to whom, to what. Is this game so dear to you?

A person on the internet states that they think certain rules of a game are bs and if they get penalized for not following them they will cease to play the game. And then to this, you reply with another hilarious response. I haven't been banned from games either. But what of it. Nobody asked for this redundant info from either of us.

"Did I read this right/Just so I understand" followed by warped and distorted perspective. Phrases like this only serve to show that you are not very sharp. Stop using them unless you really mean them.

[Kuroka]

wtf why pvp have a parser. tocxic

In the end you see everyones dmg done, received and healed? xD

[Commander_Justitia]

You can use ACT, just don't be stupid to name it as a source. Just say you looked at the battle log afterwards, if you really wanna use it for something very specific.

A reason to report with logs would be cheating. If it is 'griefing' then you probably wont need a battle log as the chat log will be more conclusive, after all you could have just kicked the person.
Being bad at the game is not griefing btw, but if its borderline hard to tell if its a bot or a real player (and they are unresponsive in chat) then I might kick them for inactivity.

[linayar]

an officially supported parser won't mean that suddenly it's okay to abuse people over numbers, it has never been and it will never be.

That won't change, but the numbers of people who will abuse because of how open it is will increase. The current official stance acts as a deterrence and people who can use the addon responsibly already are using it for the most part without issue.

If a GM seriously decides to ban me for using ACT I will ... maybe put more hours into studying instead of playing.

I see nothing wrong with that.

Yes such fun wiping on diamond cause the healer things he doesnt need to heal at all lol...

Different contents require different things. Most of the time, it's contents that don't require dps check where people will not care so much. And obviously there is also a matter of priority.

Its even worse on PvP where you can acutally see on the end who did 0 dmg... I had this guy rolling dps but never doing ANY dmg at all... like.... dam leecher...

If they don't do anything at all, that's a different issue.

[Roeshel]

I see nothing wrong with that.

Neither do I.