G'raha has proven useful even up to 5.5's story, so I think it's a wise decision for them to use G'raha instead of having to come up with other means to continue the story.I do actually agree that 5.3 would have played out better and more in line with the overall themes of Shadowbringers (nothing should last forever and there's a beauty in man's ephemerality) if the Exarch had truly died – but that wouldn't have precluded us still waking up young G'raha afterwards, just not as an alleged continuation of the same character we'd been dealing with throughout 5.X.
(My preferred take would be that the Exarch died without passing his soul into the vessel, so we could still pass his memories but not soul to young G'raha and everything would play out much the same since then – except that G'raha would be talking about the Exarch in third person.)
All that said, even if they'd simply closed the loop and had the Exarch die, without us waking up his younger self at all, the writers may have still opted to force the storyline simply because it does give that critical context to Shadowbringers and while some may be frustrated by it, on the other end there are people who are disappointed that they had no idea that they should have played it first.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.