Results 1 to 10 of 100

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Soukyuu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,086
    Character
    Crim Soukyuu
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfie View Post
    Did you read that Wikipedia article you linked? The only culture that had any kind of cycle in the elements was ancient Chinese, and even that one was nothing like any of the FF elemental strengths and weaknesses. This entire discussion is about the elemental wheel, and not the elements themselves. And there is no standard of what an elemental wheel should be. It's made up on the spot, in any game, because it's fantasy.
    Classical elements did set the standards of elemental opposites. I don't care about wheels, all I want is classical elemental opposites, which ffxiv doesn't have.

    Going Wind > Fire is not ridiculous because this is all made up bulls**t. Can you get that through your head? None of this is real. Whatever reasoning for it exists in the game now (which it does) is sufficient. The fact that you don't think it's a good fit or that it's ridiculous is a testament to the fact that you have preconceived notions from other games' equally made up bulls**t about what an 'elemental wheel' should be.
    Yes, the elements are not "real". So what? Does it make sense to change elemental relationships? If it's "all made up of bulls**t", then hey, why not make water burn ice! It doesn't have to make sense! It's just magic! Let's be original!

    The fact that you're bringing real life arguments into this is completely irrelevant. A strong wind will snuff out a weaker fire, a strong fire will be spread by wind or will suffocate it, throwing water on a grease fire will intensify it, boiling water will evaporate it, throwing dirt on fire will extinguish it, fire can melt rock into lava. You can make a case for literally anything if you start bringing real life examples because there is no such thing as an elemental wheel or cycle in real life.
    Yes, there isn't such a thing as an elemental wheel. There is common sense though.
    (2)

    [ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]

  2. #2
    Player Wolfie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,237
    Character
    Wolfie Wu
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Soukyuu View Post
    Classical elements did set the standards of elemental opposites. I don't care about wheels, all I want is classical elemental opposites, which ffxiv doesn't have.
    I'm thoroughly convinced that you didn't actually read that Wikipedia article. Classical what? Classical Greek? Where does Ice, Thunder, Astral and Umbral fit on that model?

    Classical Chinese? Where does Air, Ice, Thunder, Astral and Umbral fit on there? Classical Buddhist? There are no opposites. Hindu? Nope.

    Yes, the elements are not "real". So what? Does it make sense to change elemental relationships? If it's "all made up of bulls**t", then hey, why not make water burn ice! It doesn't have to make sense! It's just magic! Let's be original!

    Yes, there isn't such a thing as an elemental wheel. There is common sense though.
    Dude, there is no common sense here because there is no standard, and you can argue for any opposition. Do you not understand this?
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    Soukyuu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,086
    Character
    Crim Soukyuu
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Wow. Seriously now? I give up, it's like talking to a wall.
    Last hint: the diagrams show the opposites. And of course they don't have umbral/astral because they only used aether, if any.
    (1)

    [ AMD Phenom II X4 970BE@4GHz | 12GB DDR3-RAM@CL7 | nVidia GeForce 260GTX OC | Crucial m4 SSD ]

  4. #4
    Player Wolfie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,237
    Character
    Wolfie Wu
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Soukyuu View Post
    Wow. Seriously now? I give up, it's like talking to a wall.
    Last hint: the diagrams show the opposites. And of course they don't have umbral/astral because they only used aether, if any.
    I am now thoroughly convinced that you don't actually read my posts, but only briefly skim over them and cherry-pick a few words or phrases to argue against or disprove with more baseless, illogical claims and half-answers.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    Lux_Rayna's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    911
    Character
    Vynce Walker
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Miner Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Soukyuu View Post
    Wow. Seriously now? I give up, it's like talking to a wall.
    Last hint: the diagrams show the opposites. And of course they don't have umbral/astral because they only used aether, if any.
    This is the classical case of when a belief is so strong ppl convince themselves of a reality that never existed. There was never a standard...ever. Different cultures around the same historical period developed different ideas about elements and their relationships. Some had opposites, some did not. Some had some elements, others did not. You speak of standard but that article proves there *was* no standard. There was only cultural difference. For some reason you take Greek for standard, but there were plenty of systems in opposition to Greek, so I dont know where you get this notion from. Greek is the one you like, fine, just admit its personal preference. Outside of that you are making things up, standard did NOT exist.
    (1)