Part of Western culture in recent decades has been for journalists to insert their personal beliefs/takes/thoughts into their work, rather than work from an objective foundation. In fact, I'd go as far as saying it's been part of Western culture in recent decades to insert personal belief into everything, especially if it's antithetical to so called traditional values.
It's a hard charge waving the banner of progress, but what it really is, is a hard charge to societal destabilization. It gets these people hired because it creates a buzz, out of which can come really good or really bad PR. The buzz makes money either way.
Now, I'm not saying this is the first time artists and writers inserted themselves into their works. Oh heavens, no. It is the first time that all subtlety has been stripped away, and so instead of a thought provoking masterpiece, you get an attempt at thought-control via entertainment medium. And far more fiction that's just fan fiction, rather than crafted fiction. That is to say... look at one of the newer comics of Superman. They made Superboy or Superman from one of the multiverse Earths bisexual and an activist. He has kissing scenes with his boyfriend in the comic, and the boyfriend happens to look like the comic's author to a T, at least at time of writing.
Basically, a lot of Western media has been co-opted by activism of all shapes and sizes. The goal then becomes message first, entertainment second. Which kills entertainment value. Nothing wrong with what's being presented, merely how it's being presented. The same messages could be inserted behind and secondary to the entertainment, as they should be.
Unfortunately, then, the writing would have to stand on merit rather than on how much buzz it creates. How many clicks it generates. That's the way I see it, anyway.



Reply With Quote


