Gil sinks

[Artemiz]

Not trolling, but as I said, I don't see the need for gil sink in the first place.

That said, for many people, the issue isn't having gil to have a house, but having a house available. So if we're talking about gil sink, this is at least one way of handling both. People will either have the means to buy and keep a house or they won't. And if they don't, there might be others who would.

If they did this there would be about 3 taken plots on each server. Which FC exactly do you think is going to lay 50 million a month down just for the house? I dont have a house either but this will in no way solve anything.
Even then if they could get that money out of their members, those members would also have to pay for their own houses as well. How on earth is that even close to fair to people who have invested years into their houses?

[linayar]

IHow on earth is that even close to fair to people who have invested years into their houses?

The people who who have invested years into their houses are not in a disadvantageous position compared to those who haven't invested or don't even have a house. They're also the ones more likely to have the gil or be able to make gil if they can invest in their house.

[Artemiz]

The people who who have invested years into their houses are not in a disadvantageous position compared to those who haven't invested or don't even have a house. They're also the ones more likely to have the gil or be able to make gil if they can invest in their house.

I dont have a house, I still think your prices are absurd.

[linayar]

I dont have a house, I still think your prices are absurd.

Meh, I think all gil sink is absurd.

[Pinen]

Add a new move to SAM called "Gil Toss" and have 1k, 10k and 100k versions with adjusted potencies

[linayar]

Add a new move to SAM called "Gil Toss" and have 1k, 10k and 100k versions with adjusted potencies

Excuse me, but I believe that should be a Monk ability, if we go by FFIX, and I support going by FFIX.