Why am I typically last priority for Main Scenario roulettes??

[Vahlnir]

Oh so parties get priority, that explains things, it would make sense people would abuse that in order to get ahead in the ques, especially the people that would be specifically waiting for the reset to que.

How DARE players play with others in an MMORPG!

On a more serious note, get over yourself.

[Ralph2449]

How DARE players play with others in an MMORPG!

On a more serious note, get over yourself.

Nobody has any issue with that, but if by using a group you get to literally cut in line and push back people you were there before you then I stand by the term abuse because being in a group does not equal an emergency to justify literally cutting to the front of the line and thus pushing people who could have been waiting longer further back.

If it was justified I wouldn’t use the term abuse.

[linayar]

Nobody has any issue with that, but if by using a group you get to literally cut in line and push back people you were there before you then I stand by the term abuse because being in a group does not equal an emergency to justify literally cutting to the front of the line and thus pushing people who could have been waiting longer further back.

If it was justified I wouldn’t use the term abuse.

It just depends on the queue. If you have a 2-player group of a healer and a DPS and the queue only needs a DPS, that group would be bypassed by a solo queueing DPS that queues in later than the group.

If it's not justified, then the game would've forced solo queueing. Instead, it's justified because the queue can form groups as fast as it can, and that benefits everyone in the queue in the big picture.

[Vahlnir]

Nobody has any issue with that, but if by using a group you get to literally cut in line and push back people you were there before you then I stand by the term abuse because being in a group does not equal an emergency to justify literally cutting to the front of the line and thus pushing people who could have been waiting longer further back.

If it was justified I wouldn’t use the term abuse.

Except it's not abuse. It's the system working as intended by forming groups in an orderly fashion and getting everyone what they need.

[Jojoya]

Nobody has any issue with that, but if by using a group you get to literally cut in line and push back people you were there before you then I stand by the term abuse because being in a group does not equal an emergency to justify literally cutting to the front of the line and thus pushing people who could have been waiting longer further back.

If it was justified I wouldn’t use the term abuse.

No one is cutting in line.

Every role has its separate priority waiting list. When a group has someone reach #1 on the list for their role, they're next to go. Because they're a group that queued together, they go together. SE isn't going to split up a group of friends.

It's only abuse if that player who reached #1 first then ditched the group as soon as they got in the instance.