Fake FCs' Housing Abuse

[MilkieTea]

Require 6 players from 6 different accounts for house to stay active and it will go into demolition mode... or put on tax on FC houses like 2millions per month, which means more people would eb better in one, and with that involve a player tax of coin drops like 5% or something that will stack up, untill fulfilling the requirements, also would promote more active FCs.

So... FCs with 5 or 4 players are SOL? FCs that are small friend groups exist, dude.

[Almagnus1]

Easiest way to solve this is to require that FCs cannot keep housing unless they have at least four active subscriptions associated with the FC. Either way, people are still going to find loopholes in whatever gets implemented and continue to exploit that...

That said, I'm still in favor of adding additional requirements that are generally invisible to an active FC because the entire thing with shell FCs needs to go away.

[Besame]

1 person/account, entitled to 1 FC, 1 house, 1 apt, alts can share your house/FC ez-peezy.

[ReiganCross]

1 person/account, entitled to 1 FC, 1 house, 1 apt, alts can share your house/FC ez-peezy.

Y'know, I kind of like that, just limit your account to 1 FC per server. Simple, elegant, easy to implement and hard to work around without signing an entirely different account (With expansions if you want to mess with Kugane.)

BUT, and this is very important to note, I'm the kind of person that doesn't even understand why people would need an actual legitimate Alt-Character for a game like this where you can do everything on a single character. I really wouldn't be able to personally understand why people would need to also be signed to multiple FCs. And that's more on me than it not actually making sense.

Which means it's up to somebody else to point out if having your account locked to a single FC per server is a bad idea.

[Adrameliya]

1 person/account, entitled to 1 FC, 1 house, 1 apt, alts can share your house/FC ez-peezy.

[NanaWiloh]

1 person/account, entitled to 1 FC, 1 house, 1 apt, alts can share your house/FC ez-peezy.

Been suggested wont point out whats wrong with this idea.

[Almagnus1]

1 person/account, entitled to 1 FC, 1 house, 1 apt, alts can share your house/FC ez-peezy.

There's always going to be the handful of people that want to stick a char in their friend's FC especially since we can roll 8/server.

How would you suggest handling that?

[Penthea]

There's always going to be the handful of people that want to stick a char in their friend's FC especially since we can roll 8/server.

How would you suggest handling that?

I think they mean being able to be fc master of only one fc that has a house.

[Almagnus1]

I think they mean being able to be fc master of only one fc that has a house.

How would that work if an FC leadership happens (like for example) if the FC leader goes AFK and the #2 picks up the slack and continues to run the FC?

[Penthea]

How would that work if an FC leadership happens (like for example) if the FC leader goes AFK and the #2 picks up the slack and continues to run the FC?

I assume SE would put in a mechanic that prevents someone who is already fc leader of a fc with a house to become the fc leader of a second fc with a house. Like...that's the only way it would work. SE would have to change something.

But that person's idea isn't mine so I don't know how they would answer you. Anyway I think their suggestion is excessive. Limiting house ownership to be per server would be enough, and there is no reason to limit apartment ownership at all. I do agree that all alts should have access to the same private home...but I think almost everyone agrees with this given how convenient it would be for everyone. Even SE agreed this would be a good thing.