Where's this meanspirited response coming from? Yikes... they were just correcting the OP on the unique-vs-not thing.
And I am correcting them? Stating the animations come from PLD rather than GLD is inaccurate despite trying to be a correction, since they're largely reused from 1.0 which did not originally have jobs like PLD at all. You're overreacting as if I started cursing the guy out, while I was also just correcting, at most with a slightly dismissive tone, so really just about the same as the post I responded to. Yikes indeed.
If anything, the fact that every time this topic is brought up somebody has to come with a "correction" as if it was an argument against adding the option, is mean-spirited and dismissive itself, since there was no attempt at signaling that while animations may not be completely unique, it is still a valid request.
They never dismissed it - you're the one who assumed they were attempting to by simply correcting the presumption that it's a unique animation. The fact that they simply said "it's not actually unique to *blank*" (not a direct quote, obviously) means nothing other than "it's not actually unique to *blank*".And I am correcting them? Stating the animations come from PLD rather than GLD is inaccurate despite trying to be a correction, since they're largely reused from 1.0 which did not originally have jobs like PLD at all. You're overreacting as if I started cursing the guy out, while I was also just correcting, at most with a slightly dismissive tone, so really just about the same as the post I responded to. Yikes indeed.
If anything, the fact that every time this topic is brought up somebody has to come with a "correction" as if it was an argument against adding the option, is mean-spirited and dismissive itself, since there was no attempt at signaling that while animations may not be completely unique, it is still a valid request.
It's like if someone were to say "I wish the cashews in chocolate werent so crunchy" and someone else corrected by saying "theyre not cashews but walnuts." That's simply a correction. Maybe theyre wrong, but theyre not saying that the actual OPINION is invalid or anything, just doing their best to correct the misassumption.
To be honest, it's extremely meanspirited to think that whenever there's no outright praise or agreement with the view, that it's exactly the opposite and theyre against it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.