Plots everywhere demolished and open!

[LisSquid]

At this point if they put entire instanced islands up on the mog station, like ESO, I wouldn't even mind. Why have an FC house when you can make an FC village?

[SturmChurro]

Well take a look around at some other players homes. Thats one way to help get ideas going for how to decorate, and just for the fun of it. If you ever visit lamia drop by lavenderbed ward 12 plot 10, the player who owns it decorted it in a way that. Makes it give a really uncomfortable vibe and be wary of the downstairs...it kills FPS

I'll have to check it out. Yeah, some people can be very creative, and make some really nice houses. I'm sure it takes a lot of work. I would like to do the same someday.

At this point if they put entire instanced islands up on the mog station, like ESO, I wouldn't even mind. Why have an FC house when you can make an FC village?

Yeah right! ESO is a horrible example. Their instanced housing is a cash cow for them, they sell houses on there for like a hundred dollars, and do "limited" time sales. It's horrific. If we are talking JUST instanced housing to that extent, NO mogstation, yeah that'd be cool.

[LisSquid]

Yeah right! ESO is a horrible example. Their instanced housing is a cash cow for them, they sell houses on there for like a hundred dollars, and do "limited" time sales. It's horrific. If we are talking JUST instanced housing to that extent, NO mogstation, yeah that'd be cool.

Meh. Idk what else you'd spend the monthly crowns on. They pile up so I buy houses.

I'd rather they just let us buy instanced housing for gil.

[SturmChurro]

Meh. Idk what else you'd spend the monthly crowns on. They pile up so I buy houses.

I'd rather they just let us buy instanced housing for gil.

I don't have any monthly crowns. And a pile up of monthly crowns is no excuse for their "limited" time "sales", lootboxes, 50 dollar mounts, and 100 dollar houses. Not everyone is subscribed to that game, it's a buy to play game. I don't care if they have a crafting bag, it's inexcusable. It shouldn't be copied into other games. The only thing they do good is the scope of their instanced housing, aside from their cash shop.

[GeminiReed]

It's pride.

I find that very hard to believe since they've had to break their word about people losing their house.

[Shougun]

Meh. Idk what else you'd spend the monthly crowns on. They pile up so I buy houses.

I'd rather they just let us buy instanced housing for gil.

I don't have any monthly crowns. And a pile up of monthly crowns is no excuse for their "limited" time "sales", lootboxes, 50 dollar mounts, and 100 dollar houses. Not everyone is subscribed to that game, it's a buy to play game. I don't care if they have a crafting bag, it's inexcusable. It shouldn't be copied into other games. The only thing they do good is the scope of their instanced housing, aside from their cash shop.

IF SE added a means for people who sub to gain a reasonable access to mog shop items then I'd find mog shop concepts far less, BOOOO lol. But certainly if they added items to the mogshop without a reasonable source to purchase them through subscription it would be /awful/.

I see FFXIV as a sub 2 play game though so to me when I hear you get monthly tokens in ESO and it's not too hard to stack them out, honestly (in translation to FFXIV) doesn't sound that bad and actually a benefit to us if we had that. Just wanted to add some context, in case SE is wondering what people think - that'd be my thought. From the point of view of a sub 2 play game, I don't hate that idea and see it's a decent way to make some extra funds that aren't too bad. Like I don't think the seasonal on the cash shop are horrible, and actually if you had monthly tokens I feel it would be even less so. I don't really mind the stuff that doesn't fit in the game at all either, or from other FFs, but I do find stuff that's clearly from this game removed and added back in as like "boo" (but similarly on houses if there was a reasonable rate of tokens each month then 'not that bad').

This naturally assumes that they continue to produce either EQUAL or GREATER quality content that's part of the experience as well (which is where naturally many people, and rightfully so, get leery and scared of corporations rubbing their slick money lubed hands together and try to do less for more - we see this all the time).

Lootboxes should still not be a thing though, it's clearly gambling. I don't care what lawyer limbo circus someone try to pull- lootboxes are obviously gambling that pray on people's impulsive desires, but worse because there is no monetary value and are easier to do at all times as you don't have to travel to any location to be part of it (can't or are not supposed to be able to sell anything you obtain from the game). Gambling for rain water in the tropics. No lootboxes. Sell what you're going to sell, lol. (Altough for those gambling reasons I can see why they're popular to use, big money as people will spend far more than they would have on an outright purchase... which should tell you their problem and what they are in a nutshell xD). At least with trading card games you actually get an item, that you could theoretically sell (sometimes when opening a TCG pack you might make money for example, you're not making anything with digital lootboxes unless you plan to break ToS). Even that though, personally, I don't like TCG based around the gambling mechanic (random card packs)- I like the card games that just sell sets (non-random) and you get what you paid for and you know it'll be a good experience because they had to be sure that's what they were selling (selling fun, not a chance at fun).

Personally I thought if they did instanced world space housing (like Rift, Wildstar, ESO, etc) that they would provide through story a zone to each player (or account), and then if players wanted they could buy additional ones (like retainers)- maybe even strip some of the money parts of it out. Like additional spaces can store and display items, but the gardens, submarines, etc, wouldn't return items - this way people couldn't purchase printing presses (like they do with retainers.. lol). I wouldn't mind themes sold, like ESO so long as there were either two stipulations, A) it's very feasible to purchase them with monthly given tokens or B) there are in game houses that are equal in quality and the shop ones sell ONLY themes that don't belong in the game (like you might buy a midgard house, vivi village house, or something).

Said something similarly on the concept of airships, where you would not have any airship that belongs in the game sold on the cash shop BUT you could say buy FFV Lunar Whale or FFIX invincible, FFVII Highwind, etc. Especially neat if they were like the primal statues, so you could have a FF airship statue. Alternatively using the logic above if they gave a reasonable rate of monthly tokens, that'd not make it so annoying (to me). But if there was either a hilariously terrible rate of tokens, drop in quality and amount of content, or just pure exclusivity to the shop (especially stuff non-seasonal that was extracted from the game) and no tokens then I'd probably also be pretty miffed.

As I said though it's certainly fair to be leery, or just want a better value... SE may be using the funds to make better game(s) and much better working environments or they may just be giving their higher ups progressively larger and larger bonuses while everyone else crunches harder and harder with less support and worse leadership which causes lower quality games. We've actively seen the later happen for other companies. Imo I want to see SE do well and everyone their have reasonable work life enjoyment, so it's why I mentioned some of my thoughts - but I could see SE take such thoughts and twist them into making themselves a situation to do less in general while making more (while all companies have to make money a good game company will also want to make a great game at the same time).

Naturally the best would be everything in game and no shop exists and the game is perfect... Lol. Just wanted to lay out some thoughts, at least personally I think SE does still read our forums even if others have doubts.

[LisSquid]

IF SE added a means for people who sub to gain a reasonable access to mog shop items then I'd find mog shop concepts far less, BOOOO lol.

Oh, for real!! I was speaking to my fc about how it's just wrong to be a sub-to-play model AND have a cash shop. The idea of a cash shop was to supplement money that wasn't being made from a subscription model. I also have qualms with sub2play games needing you to purchase the game outright. Considering we don't get $60 worth of game at launch... but that's another argument entirely.

Lootboxes should still not be a thing though

Agreed. They're predatory no matter how to look at them, and the worst thing to come to games as a service. (I never said anything about lootboxes, so I'm not sure where that is coming from. I really was just saying larger-than-an-entire-city house plots being in the mogstation would be something I could swallow as the situation of extra retainers has been explained to us.)

The only solution to the housing situation is the expansion of apartments and instanced housing. Every time they expand wards is just sort of like they're covering their ears and going lalalalalla to every criticism of the system.

[SturmChurro]

ESO just uses the "free" monthly crowns as an excuse to jam pack their cash shop full of items. Their "limited time" sales for both lootboxes, and just general items, are a horrifying business practice. It's bait. They get your sub-fee and players will presumably dump their free crowns on certain limited items, or lootboxes, then when the next limited sale pops up they have to spend real money OR miss out, with the "limited time" header looming. They are preying on people. The exorbitant prices are just further proof. The free crowns are just there to get you into the cash shop. It's a ploy. SE on the other hand, has a cash shop with fairly reasonably priced items - in comparison to other MMOs, that isn't advertised heavily, and it's not even actually in the game. It doesn't get updated every single week, and everything sold there is there to stay, and you don't have to HOPE you get something in a lootbox. You pay up front, and you are good. I like how SE has handled their cash shop.

I do think SE should offer more, new sub rewards, however, credits to the mogstation is a debatable issue, in my opinion.

When it comes to housing. ESO has very good instanced housing. You can even see the property on the map. You can walk to it on the map - so it's there, but it's not. The scale is massive, and the amount of customization therein is amazing. SE could take notes from this, I will agree with that point, and that point alone - when it comes to ESO housing. Players could have properties even greater than having a large plot.

[Juicymama]

in memory to those who died to covid. hopefully your plot will not serve as a blank house

[LisSquid]

ESO just uses the "free" monthly crowns as an excuse to jam pack their cash shop full of items.

I use the sub to not have to buy every single little expansion pack. Dropping $15 for a month to do all the content and then not play for a while is more cost effective for me as a player. There are greater issues with them scalping rewards out of high end content for the crownstore, but that is a separate discussion that lines up with SE itself.

SE on the other hand, has a cash shop with fairly reasonably priced items

SE is a pay to play game with $40 mounts in their cash shop. For a game that has no benefit for picking one race or another (reasons race change purchases, or other games refusing to offer them, exist) they make you pay $10 for the privilege of changing your skin color.

I also don't buy the guilt-trip that "proceeds made from the mogstation go right back to ffxiv developers". That's where our sub should go.


Also I will say you can't really call ESO's limited time sales limited when they pop up like clockwork to the point people have made spreadsheets about it.