Let me start by saying your first response came off as a bit condescending. That, coupled with some of the attitudes I've run into on these boards, is why I was being a bit more aggressive, it pushed me a bit over the top. For that I'll apologize, and I think you can see where I'm coming from.
I'm not with them, but I am tired of people spreading such misconceptions about them. Looking at the American Red Cross's Audited Financial Statement for 2010 (numbers in thousands), you'll see that for a total of $1,061,137 in public support, they spent $3,102,170 directly funding their relief programs. That's a pretty good ratio if you ask me. A good enough ratio to still favor donating to them over a for-profit corporate entity without as much transparency in their financial statements. I know that donating to the American Red Cross will not help the situation in Japan, so I want to reiterate that anyone wishing to donate to relief efforts should be donating to the Japanese Red Cross, as we both suggested.
Source: http://www.redcross.org/www-files/Do...lStatement.pdf
Now let me say that if you had read my post, you'd see I wasn't suggesting S-E would be this dishonest. In fact, my exact words were "I'm not saying that S-E is that kind of company." So with that cleared up, can we move on?



Reply With Quote






