Who doesnt want gear restrictions removed?

[Vickii]

Uh-huh.

Speaking personally, I've got neither a twitter nor would I consider myself a liberal. I'd still argue removing restrictions across the board would be a universal good thing. Meaning, clearly, at least 1 person who is neither of those opposes your views too, yet you seem to group a person like me in with the lot of them.

And you're the one stimulating freedom of thought?

You’re putting words into my mouth now. I never said that you were a twitter liberal. I’d presume the person giving the definition of dog whistling is.

I think your someone who doesn’t agree and wants your say, and that’s fine, although this threads purpose was to guage the opposite opinion, there’s plenty of threads for your opinion.

I’m not saying I’m ‘right’ and you’re purposely being argumentative here. I just want to see how many people feel a similar way to me. You’re trying really hard to bully a 15 year old girl on the internet sweetie.

[Ammokkx]

I think your someone who doesn’t agree and wants your say, and that’s fine, although this threads purpose was to guage the opposite opinion, there’s plenty of threads for your opinion.

You can gauge interest while still allowing the opposite view. The fact your opener has any amount of likes shows that, to some extent, people agree.

Similarly, if you argue your side on the first page of a thread, and that post gets more likes than the OP of it, there can be a reasonable assumption that the counter-point has more interest for it than the original point.

And, once more, you forget where you are: General Discussion. Anyone can enter any thread and say their piece while it is on-topic. You not wanting them to, isn't going to stop them from doing that. And, counter to what you may believe, just because you started this thread with the intent for only one side to be heard, the topic is "Do you want gear restrictions to remain in place?" and some valid answers to that are any shade of "no." You not wanting to hear that doesn't mean it's not on-topic for the thread.

You’re trying really hard to bully a 15 year old girl on the internet sweetie.

This doesn't even work on an ironic level. Do you have an economics degree or not? Do you want me to treat you like an adult or an infant? At least try to remember your own public statements before trying to think up of new and creative ways to tell someone to be quiet.

[Yencat]

You can gauge interest while still allowing the opposite view. The fact your opener has any amount of likes shows that, to some extent, people agree.

Similarly, if you argue your side on the first page of a thread, and that post gets more likes than the OP of it, there can be a reasonable assumption that the counter-point has more interest for it than the original point.

And, once more, you forget where you are: General Discussion. Anyone can enter any thread and say their piece while it is on-topic. You not wanting them to, isn't going to stop them from doing that. And, counter to what you may believe, just because you started this thread with the intent for only one side to be heard, the topic is "Do you want gear restrictions to remain in place?" and some valid answers to that are any shade of "no." You not wanting to hear that doesn't mean it's not on-topic for the thread.



This doesn't even work on an ironic level. Do you have an economics degree or not? Do you want me to treat you like an adult or an infant? At least try to remember your own public statements before trying to think up of new and creative ways to tell someone to be quiet.

Oh now it's getting good.

The person calling people freaks, weirdos, and fetishists all over the forums is RPing as a 15 y/o girl on the very same forums?

/popcorn