Yes, I focus my play on bard. As far as your question about unlimited arrows, from a strictly 100% archer only perspective, I might say perhaps. I also have both DoM, put a little time in some of the other DoW lately, maxed at least one DoH/L and working on some others. Having said that, it seems pretty selfish to me to assume to make changes that would effect 5+ classes just for the sake of my main.
They would also make balance adjustments to the damage. The devs have stated that the only reason archers are permited to have ranged damage and be on par with the other classes. It been made very evident that if we had no consumable arrows, due to the safety of our ability to be ranged, our damage would be required to be balanced down. So to more specifically ancer yourfirst quesion another way. No, as an archer and a bard, I prefere not to see my damage lowered for the sake of losing the need for consumable arrows.
2 posters don't even give an opinion, all they do is troll and attack me for mine. I can see no justification to make adjustments that would effect 7 classes for the sake of 4 players convienence. I say 4, because if you read the thread, thats total amount of various posters who specifically said they are fro this, and thats a pretty small sample to make game changes for.
As for your 3rd question about arrows being so easy to produce, and my opinion of there price because of it. No, I think they should be more expencive, they are dirt cheap on my server. Not to mention, if everyone keeps pointing "how easy arrows are to produce" as you so specifically said, than its seems to me its a bit against your point to see everyone using that arguement. If there so easy to make, why doesn't everyone just stop complaining and make them?
You sure made the question itself pretty biased. I saw no one claiming that DoL or DoH lives "would come to an end". What I do think, is that they will be uneccissarily negatively effected. I see no reason to uneccessarily effect 2 DoL, and 4 DoH, and have my main classes damage quit possible, significantly reduced, all for the sake of the 4 people here asking for it.
Thats right, 53 post here, go back and read them, only 4 different posters mention that they are in support of this idea.