Adjustments to MCH design without reworking from scratch

[Jirah]

I don't agree that homogenizing one of the few areas where the ranged roles are different is a good idea, a job needs to have its pros and cons after all.

Id rather do that if what we are "homogenzing" wasnt complex to begin with, aswell as fine tune whats available, MCH retaining what it is plus more is alot of padding as is unless they dont add anything but a aoe and a shallow upgrade which is the strongest possibility. This is purley a manner of perspective though as we have very different views on MCH. But MCH can do better than 6 ogcd and 2 gcds and call it "rapid" rather than being rapid like MNK or BRD after Arm's muse.

[Payotz]

Id rather do that if what we are "homogenzing" wasnt complex to begin with, aswell as fine tune whats available, MCH retaining what it is plus more is alot of padding as is unless they dont add anything but a aoe and a shallow upgrade which is the strongest possibility. This is purley a manner of perspective though as we have very different views on MCH. But MCH can do better than 6 ogcd and 2 gcds and call it "rapid" rather than being rapid like MNK or BRD after Arm's muse.

I honestly really disagree, and this is not just for MCH, but for the sake of BRD as well.
BRD being good at multi target should be kept. It's a major part of its gameplay and adds a lot of incentive to actually main multiple jobs within a subrole rather than one.
Yes, MCH can do better than its current state, but that doesn't mean we should destroy the base. If anything, they should build on it(or you know revert it *wink* *wink*).
The job is barebones enough as it is.