Why is it....

[InkB]

I don't get why this is even such a big deal.
As long as one of the tanks is holding aggro, who cares which one?

I care because when I carefully placed the boss so that melee can have optimal positionals and boss abilities dont randomly screw up most "tactics" (for example O10 says hi on that regard).. and other tank provokes from other side of boss/arena.. just because they feel like provoke is part of rotation.

As for alliance raids (mostly ARR), I just find it funny how tanks fight over the boss while the adds are smashing healers into ground and no tank wants to touch them.

I mean sure, you can have the boss. But if someone wants to provoke it for no reason at least move the boss so it doesnt cleave everyone

[ADVSS]

I care because when I carefully placed the boss so that melee can have optimal positionals and boss abilities dont randomly screw up most "tactics" (for example O10 says hi on that regard).. and other tank provokes from other side of boss/arena.. just because they feel like provoke is part of rotation.

As for alliance raids (mostly ARR), I just find it funny how tanks fight over the boss while the adds are smashing healers into ground and no tank wants to touch them.

I mean sure, you can have the boss. But if someone wants to provoke it for no reason at least move the boss so it doesnt cleave everyone

In those situations i go grab up all the adds, which one would assume an aware tank would do? Call me crazy but grabbing adds sounds like something a tank would do, if the boss is already being held down. I dunno, sounds really far fetched right? Like the person responsible for cutting the light switch on standing there yelling "why is nobody cutting the light switch on?!?!"