Bozja Drop Rates Have Changed

[Risvertasashi]

It's really hard to say because we humans are very prone to confirmation bias and other forms of seeing patterns where they don't necessarily exist. (Anyone remember the "JP method" for the original relics, where a lot of people thought the droprate increased at certain times because they happened to get one during that time, and in turn told other people?)

It's possible there's a change that didn't make the changelog but as certain others have said, to really know we'd need to see a wider data set. I really won't complain if it was actually increased, though.

[Nekaru_Infitima]

Why get aggressive when he's quoting the fully accurate developer patch notes and all you have to prove them inaccurate is a 20 minute sample from one person?

I get aggressive because it's not required.
It's the equivalent of someone shoving a manual in your face after you've already said you read it and were talking about something else aside from the manual.
It's redundant.
The only reason one would do it is to try to be a know-it-all and treat the opening poster like they were stupid.

I clearly said I ALREADY KNEW it wasn't in the patch notes.

[Kaoru_Nagisa]

I get aggressive because it's not required.
It's the equivalent of someone shoving a manual in your face after you've already said you read it and were talking about something else aside from the manual.
It's redundant.
The only reason one would do it is to try to be a know-it-all and treat the opening poster like they were stupid.

I clearly said I ALREADY KNEW it wasn't in the patch notes.

You're never gonna make a case for yourself by acting like a child throwing a temper tantrum when someone simply provides info to reiterate a point, just as a by the by.

Also RNG be RNG. Claiming rates have changed just because you're suddenly having better luck now than before is what's stupid, frankly.

[Ahnthistik]

I get aggressive because it's not required.
It's the equivalent of someone shoving a manual in your face after you've already said you read it and were talking about something else aside from the manual.
It's redundant.
The only reason one would do it is to try to be a know-it-all and treat the opening poster like they were stupid.

I clearly said I ALREADY KNEW it wasn't in the patch notes.

damn sis who hurt you, i mean at least you're self aware you're st*p*d. small steps.

[Awha]

I get aggressive because it's not required.
It's the equivalent of someone shoving a manual in your face after you've already said you read it and were talking about something else aside from the manual.
It's redundant.
The only reason one would do it is to try to be a know-it-all and treat the opening poster like they were stupid.

I clearly said I ALREADY KNEW it wasn't in the patch notes.

People make mistakes just own up to it. No need to get defensive.