
Originally Posted by
Skies
I cannot given an answer to that given I do not think that holds true, sorry. You could tell me why you think it does, though.
They are! Just every bit as good as thunder, I'd say! In their particular roles. For diminished damaged, Fire gains AoE and it's just as good at AoE damage as Thunder is good in ST damage (Thunder-level damage to an AoE would be overpowered), Blizzard exchanges damage for enfeebling statuses and in Blizarra's case instant cast. Blizzard is as good at enfeebling as Thunder is good at dealing damage! They have very distinct roles and are equally proficient, in their own roles.
I think it's consensus that Burst is excessively underwhelming, that one I cannot excuse but i've no experience with it. However, you need to reavail your concepts, Freeze is not a direct DD spell, but it increases your DPS considerably by reducing your enmity by a large amount. Like the rest of the Blizzard spells it's a utility, not a raw damage, spell and from what I gather it's incredibly powerful at it's role, utility and 'buff'. Flare, presumably, has an extremely high amount of damage for an AoE, so instead of paying with damage for the AoE it instead pays with target restriction.
Presumably, because White Mage is not supposed to have that powerful of a spell. Seriously, for that much power and instant cast for a job that's certainly not meant to deal damage, why, it's a suitable price. What other price would you suggest?
Presumably so cheap tactics like 'stunlocking' aren't usable and so that 'trench battles' become an uphill challange, making the playerbase shy away from excessively long, drawn-out battles and adding a more dynamic element to battle. Wether they implemented that correctly or failed at it, I cannot say, but it's possible to discern the intent of it.