Quote Originally Posted by Almagnus1 View Post
Please explain why any FC that has less than the number of players needed to create it (which is 4) should be able to own property. IMO all FCs that have 3 or less members should be stripped of their property after a sufficient amount of time has elapsed so they have the opportunity to bring their FC to bring it up to at least four members.
This is the fifth or sixth time now that you've argued that FCs and their houses should be terminated if the membership count falls below 4. Micro FC's are a thing. You have even acknowledged it in posts.


Link to Pic

Yet whenever asked why, you have continued to dodge. 4-people to make an FC is a technical requirement to make an FC. SE has not written anywhere that a FREE COMPANY must absolutely be no less than four people or else.

> Please explain why you think the number of people in an FC correlates with the proficiency of that FC and the effectiveness/activity level of that FC.
> What exactly is "active"? Who determines what active is? You?
> Why is being over 4 so specifically the difference between being deserving of a house and not?


So if 4 friends are playing actively, and one has an unfortunate circumstance that prevents them from playing or they decided to just quit one day, that FC should be wiped off the planet now according to you and have their house removed. There are 3-man FCs that are more effective and active than some 50-man FCs. But according to you any FC with less than 4 people is an abomination and should face immediate termination.

Once again you've decided this time to move the goal posts as you always do every conversation. So why don't you tell us this time what your excuse is? Are you even capable of thinking about things beyond so strictly black and white?