Quote Originally Posted by Crushnight View Post
Difference is how well the reasoning would fly, you show a full in game model of female Hrothgar and they are still not going to be playable, will probably have a bigger following to try and make them playable than just having illustrations of them. As my earlier post said it is a road best not tread, illustrations sure but full models will cause the JP fanfest 2.0 situation of unnecessary vitriol towards the devs and the reasoning of models ain't there will lose traction even of they wear 1 outfit people would demand that 1 outfit female Hrothgar so they can mod it on their PCs.

Again a road best left untread unless prepared for what it will bring and they weren't prepared for the amount the male Hrothgar reveal brought upon them.
Mmm actually no. I know... it's easy to think that once one is modeled, it would be game playable. However, we have models for many humanoid creatures we can't play. Like a primal. Shiva, Garuda, Sophia or a beastman. It could have been done well enough like that and to know that the model wasn't in any way playable. It would have probably lent more to the narrative of the story. In fact, the idea of seeing THE QUEEN, I figured she would look more different given her position that I thought a one off Primal type model was going to be used. Basically, I never thought once that if they showed the Queen, she'd actually be a "prototype playable model" but a model with much higher detail.

But anyways, my main objection towards this was that it's kind of disappointing that this was used more as snark at the playerbase than actually answering the OP's question.