The top issue is about the rng timer is. 24 hours standing is the real issue.You're just proving my point. Supply is the issue. You add more supply more people get houses. If they had enough houses for everyone we wouldn't be having this conversation.
But that's not what we're talking about here. You're comparing apples to oranges. We're taking about what system should be used when someone who owns a house relinquishes it. No one owned the houses that were added with the new wards so obviously no circumventing the normal buying process with a player to player deal was possible. We're talking about situations when all the added houses have been purchased and someone gives their house up. How do you give the most people a chance at the house. That's what we're talking about.
No system is going to be fair to people who cannot get a house using it, that's just the long and short of it. Changing it will just bring new problems and complaints. You're just spinning your wheels will avoiding the actual issue, which is supply.
How do you not realise that there would be no need for demolition and no need for placard timers if the game had enough or unlimited houses?
Seriously this thing that is making you tear your hair out with frustration exists because of a lack of houses. Literally every issue with acquisition and ownership can be traced back to a lack of houses. Everything else is just a symptom of that one problem.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.