Also, while this thread is semi-revived, I had a question about WS -> Spell combos.

Everyone seems to like the idea of Red Mage having WS -> Spell combos (I do too), but I was wondering, should those combos be required, alternate, or optional?

Here's what I mean:

Required:

Example: WS1 -> Spell -> WS2

This format is the simplest to implement and understand. It works the same as any other three step combo. The spell cast is required to continue the combo into WS2. This causes MP to be a limiting factor, meaning you will be unable to perform any combos if you are out of MP. It also has the secondary effect of potentially unnesseccarily building the target's resistance a particular enfeeble if one combo is strongly favored for DPS purposes (and therefore used as often as possible). However this method does allow for optimal DPS output.

Alternate:

Example: WS1 -> Spell
OR: WS1 -> WS2

This method eliminates the MP requirements of the previous example by dividing the combo into seperate two step combos. This allows you more freedom in choosing when you want to cast debuffs or simply deal damage. However it causes a drop in DPS since you would be required to choose between using your TP to open a spell combo or a damage combo.

Optional:

Example: WS1 -> Spell -> WS2
OR: WS1 -> WS2

This format eliminates all drawbacks in the system and allows you to freely choose when to cast your spells without sacrificing damage potential. This seems like the obvious solution except for the fact that it is not currently supported by the combo system so changes would have to be made, and maybe you might want to have one of the limitations described above, you know, for the sake of balance (lolbalance).