Final Fantasy 16 was announced

[Lily_Skye]

imagine buying a ps5 kekw

[Hycinthus]

Now I’m confused. Should i buy ps5?

Now i have 3 games on PS5 backlog, since i dont have PS4.

Ff16.
Ff7R for backward compatible. Cyberpunk for backward compatible.

3 games seems worth it no?

[HeulGDarian]

Now I’m confused. Should i buy ps5?

Now i have 3 games on PS5 backlog, since i dont have PS4.

Ff16.
Ff7R for backward compatible. Cyberpunk for backward compatible.

3 games seems worth it no?

if you got a good pc , like 5700xt gpu kind of good then you may just want to w8 for the sony ssds to hit the market. the selling point of ps5 isnt the 144hz , its the ssd architecture that allows for games to load more efficient than current ssds to the point of old ssds being unable to handle it, though they cant take full advantage of them yet cause until they hit the market theyd be unable to port the games to other systems.
There will also be amds version of rtx but it will still be a gimmick till the world catches up , meaning games optimising for rtx would be at most an afterthought.

Id say PS5 is well worth the purchase, it certainly is undeniably a pioneer in ssd architecture and for the gaming future.

[MistyMew]

Have not seen any high heels yet.....!! Will keep watching as time goes by

come on SE ,you can convince me to buy the game ......high....heels

[GrizzlyTank]

Looks interesting, though the trailer didn't seem to have the same punch as the ones for 13 and 15. Guessing that all shown is fairly early in the story seeing how one of the protagonists are fighting goblins.

Have not seen any high heels yet.....!! Will keep watching as time goes by

come on SE ,you can convince me to buy the game ......high....heels

High heels are an affront to humanity!

[Ruf]

With ps4 sony lost me as a customer for the current time being, without bashing ffxii or xiv,,, I shall say that after a long period of time I have tried XV and that, while the graphics are very nice, the actual gameplay is garbage. I play/played that like 30minutes per 2months... its not even worth that IMO. Abidding by my comment, I will never buy ffvii remake, I enjoyed the original game way too much to destroy the classic aspect of original Final Fantasys. I think that the active combats in the current route at which are designed new FFs are making Final Fantasy less and less appealing for the players that enjoyed the true FinalFantasys of the past. Unless the evolution of XVI goes toward what should be normal for a Final Fantasy game, I do not believe that I will be purchasing it. Long live to XI!

Yoshi, I hope this comment reach out to you.

[SilverObi]

...I think that the active combats in the current route at which are designed new FFs are making Final Fantasy less and less appealing for the players that enjoyed the true FinalFantasys of the past. Unless the evolution of XVI goes toward what should be normal for a Final Fantasy game, I do not believe that I will be purchasing it. Long live to XI!...

Bruh. Even as someone who's been playing XI since 2005 and been an FF fan for even longer, I can't agree with you trying to define what counts as a "real" Final Fantasy. Turn-based had its time and place and they still exist in the older titles as well as other IPs, and you're just railing against actual evolution while wanting regression to a style that's become niche over time. You don't have to like every FF but to try and delegitimize other entries because you don't enjoy them is pretty sad.

[GrizzlyTank]

Bruh. Even as someone who's been playing XI since 2005 and been an FF fan for even longer, I can't agree with you trying to define what counts as a "real" Final Fantasy. Turn-based had its time and place and they still exist in the older titles as well as other IPs, and you're just railing against actual evolution while wanting regression to a style that's become niche over time. You don't have to like every FF but to try and delegitimize other entries because you don't enjoy them is pretty sad.

Pretty much. FF have never had a fixed combat style and action combat is just a natural progression from the wait system that appears in every odd game. What does make FF... FF is the various iconic features such as chocobos, moogles, something crystal related, an evil empire, a dying world and a jester that ruins everything.

Nah, i think they removed that because it literally reads as "Hey, just remember, you don't need to buy the brand new PlayStation 5 in order to play this game, because we'll release a PC version too!!!". Sony probably didn't like that and asked them to change it

Whatever contract Sony has with square probably includes the denial of other releases for 6-12 months. Other then that, any software running on PS4-PS5 should be capable of running almost natively on a decent desktop since all these machines now use same architecture.

[Ruf]

Bruh. Even as someone who's been playing XI since 2005 and been an FF fan for even longer, I can't agree with you trying to define what counts as a "real" Final Fantasy....you're just railing against actual evolution while wanting regression to a style that's become niche over time.

I'm no bruh, we agree to disagree, I do not believe that I am railing against the evolution as you say so, if anything FF was niche content from the start of the franchise and what you call niche is actually what could/would ""in my opinion (And I am not the only one who think that)"" bring back FF to its origins of gameplay with modern technology. The best of both worlds exist and atm its not what we have at all. On my behalf, what I currently see that you call "evolution" is video games industry standards, aaaaannndd I do not want that.

Non merci.

[Bellsong]

I have zero problems with the game becoming DMC level action, FF would easily fade into obscurity if they didn't upgrade/move away from the ancient ways of turn based combat.

My problems lay with the fact that if you slap a FF15 logo over any screenshot from the trailer no one would be able to tell it's actually 16.