Frustrating relative lack of LGBT NPCs in this game

[Raoabolic]

I see your point here and it would be nice if it were the case. It doesn't seem that way to me. If most people didn't care if it were added or not, then why the amount of pushback? Why any?

Because no one likes a hamfisted story. A character's sexuality should not mean anything to the story. If it's some blurb on the codex that doesn't screw the lore then who cares? Thing is that every story that had "representation" were very cringy. The only time I think I thought they did it well was in the Witcher 2. It wasn't shoved in your face but if you asked too many questions then of course it would come out. That's on you for being too nosey with a person's personal affairs, lol.

[Xirean]

Where is the pushback? I think a majority of the arguements through out this thread weren't even about the game itself, was mostly pop-political banter.

As if on que here's some pushback right below you.

Because no one likes a hamfisted story. A character's sexuality should not mean anything to the story. If it's some blurb on the codex that doesn't screw the lore then who cares? Thing is that every story that had "representation" were very cringy. The only time I think I thought they did it well was in the Witcher 2. It wasn't shoved in your face but if you asked too many questions then of course it would come out. That's on you for being too nosey with a person's personal affairs, lol.

Straight couples exist in the main scenario in a way that you cannot ignore them; why not a gay couple? That's really the main thing people are asking for. For some it's the only thing.

They exist because cause it pushes the story forward in a way an LGT character cannot aka having children. In both real-life and stories being LGT is effectively a dead-end lifestyle with no future or legacy at least the Bs have a choice to continue their bloodlines.

Right so where are the Chai's kids? Also great way to reduce every relationship into one assumed goal of children.