EXILE (linkshell) - Immediate change needed - non ranged ability!

[Dusk_Shardveil]

A linkshell owner should be able to exile any member with impunity. Even if it is not technically possible (right now) when a GM or staff request is made by the owner to exile a player from a given linkshell it should be carried out and not treated just as an abuse report. It is the owner's right to moderate and control their linkshells as they see fit.

You cant stand next to someone if they are hiding in their inn.

Even if there is no abuse. Falling out between linkshell members happens all the time. It would be in the greater interest and peace to not limit the range of moderation commands.

[YuriSan]

This is one of those threads that a DEV never actually replies to...

It's funny how many times the "give us linkshell administration options" issue came up
in this forum but nothing happened, just some *cricket* *cricket* *cricket*

[Antipika]

This is one of those threads that a DEV never actually replies to...

It's funny how many times the "give us linkshell administration options" issue came up
in this forum but nothing happened, just some *cricket* *cricket* *cricket*

We had replies... It's coming in 2.0... What else do you need? It's not like something will happen if the current game doesn't allow it or if it would take too much time/resources to make something that would be useless in less than a year time now.

[YuriSan]

What else do you need?

EVERYTHING!

Game been around for over a year...
The requests/complaining regarding this feature have been around for over a year aswell...

Everyone been asking for a looong time.
It's not like peeps started to complain about it yesterday

My point, peeps had trouble dealing with ls issues for a long time.
They should have found a way to make it happen cause it is a major issue not some pebble in your shoe
you cute little girl Lalafel you.

[Griss]

This is yet another systemic issue that should have not made it past closed testing.

/lscmd kick "name" How bleeping hard is that?

[Kinseykinz]

When we have to reform our ls (I've thankfully never had to do it because someone just went ape in /l chat), I copy+paste our ls roster from lodestone into a word doc on my computer (you can do it from other sites as well if you have them updated). Then, I let the ls know it's happening and tell leaders privately if there are people that can't be invited back without first talking to me (this is also rare). Most of the times I've had to do this, it is because of inactive people clogging up the roster.

This being said, I agree 100% that LS Master's should be able to boot/invite/promote people without having to be standing next to them. If we have to wait until 2.0 that is okay... but with the introduction of Inns, which allow players to 'hide', a GM should be able to over-ride/boot a member if called by the LS master.

[abby]

Here's my solution so I don't let jerks into my LS...I talk to them for a while with just general conversation to see what they're like then determine to recruit them so I don't have to track them down later for them being absurd and idiotic.

[BeePee]

Hell, it'd just be nice if LS masters can kick inactive players.

Having to break and re-pearl just because too many people no longer play is absolutely ridiculous.

[Nanamix]

Yes, yes and yes to this thread.

[Fazrenar]

Thank you Square-Enix!
Fixed in Patch 1.22