All these people talking about class balance.

Shouldn't archer's have crappy attack power? I mean they are dealing ranged damaged, there should be a difference in damage between them and physically close melees. You nerf this, people will complain.

You nerf the def or att of warrior, people are going to complain. I play warrior and I'm actually in favor of reducing the def of warrior. I don't want to tank all the time and like to deal aoe damage.

SE has close to never nerfed any classes lately, they just buff up other classes and call it a done deal. Remember when in DH how archers were only wanted? SE buffed up all other dd weapon skills. Why not reduce the damage of the archer? I don't know, I'm going on a rant.

Point blank, class balancing is not that easy and the way SE goes around with buffing everything else won't cut it. They just did it with PLD and it doesn't seem to be working.

Overall, just get rid of TA SE >.> No one likes it.