Thread: 5.3 Preliminary Patch Note

Re: Coincounter (The Rage continues!)

I mean, there needed to be a lesson somewhere that some mobs don't use telegraphs. Did it need to be a boss? Sure, fine, whatever. BUT there could have been lesser versions in an earlier dungeon that were just "harder" trash mobs (think Marlboro level difficulty in Aurum Veil). Or, alternatively, keep the mechanics as is, but only have them deal a very survivable but shocking amount of damage (say 80% max hp to a healer at iLVL).

Originally Posted by kaynide

Re: Coincounter (The Rage continues!)

I mean, there needed to be a lesson somewhere that some mobs don't use telegraphs. Did it need to be a boss? Sure, fine, whatever. BUT there could have been lesser versions in an earlier dungeon that were just "harder" trash mobs (think Marlboro level difficulty in Aurum Veil). Or, alternatively, keep the mechanics as is, but only have them deal a very survivable but shocking amount of damage (say 80% max hp to a healer at iLVL).

Enemies that "don't use telegraphs" should never 1 hit kill. The lack of a telegraph is only acceptable if you're given the opportunity to learn and adjust throughout the course of the fight.

Originally Posted by Goji1639

Enemies that "don't use telegraphs" should never 1 hit kill. The lack of a telegraph is only acceptable if you're given the opportunity to learn and adjust throughout the course of the fight.

Now this I'm two sided one.. on one hand I do agree with that. On the other hand I think it depends on how it's done. If I'm correct you are trying to say it should've been programed better correct? They had the right idea, but the animation he does before the move doesn't match. You don't NEED the aoe to get the point accross, at the same time he needed better more to the point animations if they didn't want to put an AOE marker there. They have done this in the 24 mans and various other bosses. They just goofed on coin I think.