
Originally Posted by
YianKutku
As mentioned, the Ascians lie even when they have no reason to. Or at least no reason known to players, and given how they refuse to explain themselves even unto Final Death, we'll never know any alleged reason either.
An example would be Emet-Selch praising our character for making friends, and saying that this is what Empires should do. Which is trivially disproven by both how Empires work in RL and in-game history, and how Emet-Selch deliberately engineered his empires to be as hostile and anti-integration as he could get away with. And yet, he gave us that non-sequitur, implying that it's relevant to his own experiences, but never outright saying so, thus maintaining plausible deniability. All this, when he had no reason to bring up empire-building in the first place, since he could just talk about how "an old friend" (or however he wanted to refer to Azem) also made friends wherever they went, among other possible examples.
And with the Ascians, being contradictory with their lies is the norm, since their response is usually a variation on "so what".
I'm not ruling out that Emet-Selch is actually telling the truth when he says the Final Days was a result of the "hubris" of the Ancients, or even the possibility that it was a direct result of that hubris. But without any other corroborating evidence, I cannot take his (or any Ascians') word at face value.