Results 1 to 10 of 68

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Lyth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Meracydia
    Posts
    3,883
    Character
    Lythia Norvaine
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Viper Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Ultimatecalibur View Post
    ..
    Sure, you can make tankbusters happen more frequently. My point here moreso is that if invulns were on a personal LB gauge, then fights could be designed such that your invuln only shows up when the fight designer wants you to have access to it, much like the group LB works.

    Quote Originally Posted by BarretOblivion View Post
    ...
    I think the point here is that if invulns were less accessible, the rest of your defensive kit would matter a whole lot more. So you'd have to actually ration your defensive cooldown use to survive.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Kabooa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    4,391
    Character
    Jace Ossura
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Goldsmith Lv 100
    There is no short way to go about this, but I'll give it a shot.

    The primary reason we divide up into archetypes / roles / 'classes' is so that we divide up responsibility, particularly into packages that complement each other and focus on a particular area of the game.

    It is about creating packages that provide an individual the most interaction in what they find fun and the least amount of interaction in what they don't.

    This means that anything that is put into the package that actively takes away from the rest is a problem. I don't think that's controversial.

    However, deciding what each "Package" consists of is where there will be disagreements.

    Edit: Turns out there is a really short way to go about it.

    Replace them with Super-States, in which the Super States are temporary phases of high durability with an offensive pay off. More interactive and it satisfies "DaMaGe Is KiNg".

    That was way easier than writing an essay.
    (2)
    Last edited by Kabooa; 07-19-2020 at 07:01 AM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Ultimatecalibur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    2,737
    Character
    Kakita Ucalibur
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 86
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyth View Post
    Sure, you can make tankbusters happen more frequently. My point here moreso is that if invulns were on a personal LB gauge, then fights could be designed such that your invuln only shows up when the fight designer wants you to have access to it, much like the group LB works.
    At that point Invulns might as well not exist or exist only as a duty action.

    I think the point here is that if invulns were less accessible, the rest of your defensive kit would matter a whole lot more. So you'd have to actually ration your defensive cooldown use to survive.
    Right now every tank has more than enough cooldowns to handle a 110% max hp tank buster every 25 sec or a 150% max hp tank buster roughly every 60 secs even without the invulns thanks to their 25s cooldown (Sheltron/HoS/TBN/Raw Intuition), 90s Rampart and 120s 30% (Sentinel, Vengeance, Shadow Wall and Nebula).

    Limiting the Invulns wouldn't change this.

    The Invulns get problematic when they get used instead of the other defensive cooldowns so that other mechanics can be ignored. Invulns get used to negate the need for a tank swap, tether swap or stack on the tank mechanic. Those are the mechanics that need to come more than every 2 minutes not just simple tank busters.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    Nefimmyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    9
    Character
    Dubhlind Coineascar
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 80
    Doesn't PLD already have to do that as it lacks personal cooldowns out of the 4 tanks? As well as the other tanks to some degree. So that notion seems unnecessary, especially since they've removed a lot of mitigation skills from Stormblood and previous xpacs so tanks universally have fewer to each job they already ration out. Each "spammy" mitigation they do have even comes with a downside or limitation inherently: Sheltron uses Oath gauge, limiting you to 2 in a row at a time; Heart of Stone is the weakest as far as protection; The Blackest Night costs 3000 mp, which you only can pull of 3 ideally before bottoming out your MP (capped at 10000); and is a WAR uses Raw Intuition, it costs a usage of Nascent Flash and to use Nascent Flash costs a usage of Raw Intuition.
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    Absurdity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    2,956
    Character
    Tiana Vestoria
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Nefimmyr View Post
    Doesn't PLD already have to do that as it lacks personal cooldowns out of the 4 tanks? As well as the other tanks to some degree. So that notion seems unnecessary, especially since they've removed a lot of mitigation skills from Stormblood and previous xpacs so tanks universally have fewer to each job they already ration out. Each "spammy" mitigation they do have even comes with a downside or limitation inherently: Sheltron uses Oath gauge, limiting you to 2 in a row at a time; Heart of Stone is the weakest as far as protection; The Blackest Night costs 3000 mp, which you only can pull of 3 ideally before bottoming out your MP (capped at 10000); and is a WAR uses Raw Intuition, it costs a usage of Nascent Flash and to use Nascent Flash costs a usage of Raw Intuition.
    Tank cooldowns are actually more abundant due to the relatively low tank damage and the very spread out tank busters. You pretty much always have your 30% or 20% ready for each tankbuster and your short, fast recast mitigation like Raw. So you don't really "need" invulns for a fight, it often just frees up mitigation for fluff damage.
    (2)

Tags for this Thread