Does Square intend to address Market botting?

[Kes13a]

so I am guessing that you approve of cheating and people using bots because "it benefits everyone" by keeping the game healthy

sorry, just seems to be where your opinion is leading towards.

dont get me wrong, I have little problem bringing prices down, and teh usual reason is so people can afford things. I guess I just dislike people cheating and not actually playing the game. I use the market to "pvp" with real people.. not bots.

[ItMe]

so I am guessing that you approve of cheating and people using bots because "it benefits everyone" by keeping the game healthy

sorry, just seems to be where your opinion is leading towards.

dont get me wrong, I have little problem bringing prices down, and teh usual reason is so people can afford things. I guess I just dislike people cheating and not actually playing the game. I use the market to "pvp" with real people.. not bots.

No cuz bots are bad.
I can enjoy the idea of lower markets but still not like cheating and people using 3rd party tools to exploit the game and it's community.
Good question though. You're right, the way I outlined my thoughts that seemed pretty contradictory.

[ItMe]

So yes, if they were meaning to say low prices are good for the game, I am okay with that. what seemed to be implied was that the bots were keeping the prices low, and not actual players, which I disagree with (since I tend to be one of those crazies that drops a price by 10k+ and not a measly 1 gil)

I'm sorry, I thought I responded to this.
Yes. You've hit the nail on the head.
I feel that low prices are good for the health of the game.
I'm not sure where the implication about bots came up. I don't seem to have even mentioned bots in my posts before you brought them up.
Where did I imply bots were a force for good (or anything along those lines)?
Touching on the source of that misunderstanding might clear up a lot of the confusion in this conversation.