Does Square intend to address Market botting?

[Kes13a]

Ya, the ban waves don't really do anything to the main issues fueling RMT and the like either. And thats 2.5 days of them not generating money. If they were actively hitting the accounts on the weekly, losing 1/3 of a week of bot activity on all or most of their bots would make it a bad ROI overall to relevel the bots constantly (especially if they get caught during leveling too).

Basically have to make it worse and worse ROI for botters to make it a bigger hassle releveling constantly and very little overall uptime on the bots (since it does take them resources and time to get all the gear too for the bot to be able to effectively gather things or to even generate crafted goods)

I think when they ban shouldnt be just an account ban, run the IP as well. SE's bans are basically lip service, I mean seriously, you ban hacked accounts and the stupid botters, the smarter ones they arent even touching

[TheLoveJenovan]

1. Tierny12, did you receive a response to your message and, if so, would you post it here? At this stage, I'm just hoping for at least an acknowledgement that this is a bad issue on NA and Europe servers.

2. Kes13a, banning by ip could work to some extent, but spoofing IPs and VPNs could circumvent this approach. I think they should ban by the name that appears on the credit card to also avoid virtual credit card numbers. Stolen credit cards wouldn't be too useful to bots, since these can get cancelled after a couple of weeks.

3. Cheating stats. Does anyone know how these stats relate to the bots we're discussing? Has anyone witnessed a market/gathering bot getting banned? Last week, 1,721 accounts were banned for RMT advertising and 2,634 bots were banned for "other" RMT offenses. If the "other" category covers the market and harvesting bots we're discussing, this would be ~39 bots per server (68 servers). I have never seen a market or harvesting bot banned. At the same time, "non-RMT" bot bans are only 1 with 26 accounts suspended, which makes me think the bots we're discussing aren't considered RMT activity. If this is indeed the case, I think they're only enforcing RMT bans at the last transaction between vendor and player.

https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...92a05c481b70ff

4. I'm not sure SE reads this forum (or the Japanese one). Are there other suggestions for venues in which we could tell the devs this is a problem?

5. Does anyone know if there is an allowed access to the FFXIV API? I looked into writing a script to identify market bots, but the sources of data appear to be quite stale. For example, xivapi.com doesn't post market data anymore, universalis doesn't have fresh data and the companion app api appears to be a violation of the TOS. If SE is willing to give some developers access to the API, writing scripts to identify these bots should be fairly straightforward.

[Kes13a]

True, just the IP would only be a start, account, IP and name on the credit card should be the basics they do.

Yeah, their bans only grab the low hanging, easy to spot in your face kind of bots. and they never post WHERE those bans took place. lets face it, those could all be stats from Japan for all we know and no bans take place here in NA or Europe, which, if you ask me, seems more to be the case.

In all honesty, I think it would take 50% of the player base cancel;ling their subs and listing market/harvest botting as the reason for any word to get to the devs. unless we can get a question to Yoshi P in one of their broadcasts to have him answer, we wont know

[NamidaTekika]

I think when they ban shouldnt be just an account ban, run the IP as well. SE's bans are basically lip service, I mean seriously, you ban hacked accounts and the stupid botters, the smarter ones they arent even touching

Given the nature of dynamic IP addresses, IP bans are relativly ineffective (as also Jenovan mentioned too, VPNs and the like). Now if the game collects like hardware ID or something that might be effective, don't know what the client collects myself. Account bans wouldn't be bad, and honestly it should trigger an investigation into any FC that is like 10 or less that the bot is in IMO.

[Kes13a]

Given the nature of dynamic IP addresses, IP bans are relativly ineffective (as also Jenovan mentioned too, VPNs and the like). Now if the game collects like hardware ID or something that might be effective, don't know what the client collects myself. Account bans wouldn't be bad, and honestly it should trigger an investigation into any FC that is like 10 or less that the bot is in IMO.

especially if 8 of those are under 35 with one omni crafter/harvester in the FC

but again, thats a perfect world where SE would care