Geomancer

[ArcaneCarbuncle]

I don't think anybody was saying other elements are completely off the table – with the chambers of Swallow's Compass ending in "Heart of the Dragon" with a fire-throwing tengu inside, I could see a rotation built around cycling between Earth, Wind and Water to end with a massive Fire finisher (perhaps magma-based to maintain distinction from the fire spells flung by other casters), much as BLM and RDM build up to non-elemental finishers. Plus it could tie in well with the classical elements, even though Feng Shui uses the five Chinese elements (excluding wind, and including wood which has the same place, and metal).

If you mean all six though, I should point out none of the dedicated casters practice more than four elements – largely because more than three isn't really necessary for all practical purposes (hence why SMN has only 3 Egis despite six pure-elemental primals), and RDM's dual model essentially gives it clones of really only three spells. So while Ice and Lightning aren't off the table, they wouldn't entirely be unnecessary.

Well, there is so much discussion going on about GEO being oh-so-similar to Conjurer that it seems to me that people are forgetting that the other elements were part of the classic skillset as well. So I thought I'd put it back on the table.
Real-Life Feng Shui doesn't need to have much bearing on how GEO would be designed here, seeing as in-game it seems all but accepted anywhere that there are six elements; and other games' iterations of the job also mainly focus on the whole terrain/weather-gimmick which had nothing to do with Real-Life Feng-Shui either.
I also feel it's important to point out that AST for instance, while being based on RL-Astrology, takes plenty of liberties with the concept, so GEO can take as many liberties with Feng-Shui as it needs.
In many ways, I find this games elemental cycle(s) already reminicent of the Feng-Shui elements, but maybe thats just me.

Mechanically there are many ways to include all elements, they could for instance create a dual-rotation - one on the GCD, one on the oGCD - based on the two elemental cycles we've learned about.

Ultimately though I think a full elemental caster is a concept that they haven't explored before (other than Y'shtolas Sorceress), and might be an interesting concept for them to take given GEO's history.
And I think they should look at the entire History of the job should they ever choose to create it, not just the bits and pieces of lore they created when they still tried to shoehorn GEO into AST.
Ignoring an otherwise interesting concept because 'practicality' also seems like a waste, considering the elements are purely visual in this game anyway.

[BasicBlake]

And I think they should look at the entire History of the job should they ever choose to create it, not just the bits and pieces of lore they created when they still tried to shoehorn GEO into AST.

Well there is history of a class and then there is a history they have established for a class in game.

The debate of the Ast quests will also always be here I feel like, because it is so split down the middle on how people interpreted those quest chains. Wasn't all that was said was Levava saying how they were similar due to drawing power from a star/stars and that their casting complemented eachother? Also that they could learn a lot about their own schools of magic from studying the other. I know that Swallow's Compass was released in 4.3 a year after the Stormblood launch with the Ast class quests and nothing about that dungeon was very astro-y, granted this is also just opinion.

I know at the time there was a big debate of people saying that this was SE shifting Ast to a more Geomancer centered style of play, but Ast have never received or even had anything Geomancer related in their kit.

[ArcaneCarbuncle]

Well there is history of a class and then there is a history they have established for a class in game.

And they obviously should use the history they already created, I just don't think they should limit themselves to it.
I'd simply prefer for them to come up with a unique concept, both for gameplay and visually, and adjust the lore as necessary. They can do so and have done so before.
For example, while the lore we've got up until now says GEO usually uses Water/Earth/Wind, that might be simply because these elements tend to be the most accessible, but a skilled GEO in the right environment can draw on any element of their choosing. Its just not common knowledge due to the relative rarity of volcanic/frozen/thunderous environments. Fits well enough with GEOs classic theme of using the Environment and explains why we've never seen a GEO use Ice/Fire/Thunder before while leaving the door open for them to be part of the skillset.

The debate of the Ast quests will also always be here I feel like, because it is so split down the middle on how people interpreted those quest chains. Wasn't all that was said was Levava saying how they were similar due to drawing power from a star/stars and that their casting complemented eachother? Also that they could learn a lot about their own schools of magic from studying the other. I know that Swallow's Compass was released in 4.3 a year after the Stormblood launch with the Ast class quests and nothing about that dungeon was very astro-y, granted this is also just opinion.

Never said AST and GEO were the same thing, lorewise they were always presented as seperate entities. It just always seemed to me like SE originally planned to roll some concepts from GEO into AST rather then make GEO a standalone job, what with Leveva musing about fusing the schools and all.
At least that's always been my theory; though it seems they've abandoned that idea - probably due to player feedback or popular demand for standalone GEO or shift in Healer and/or overall job design or any combination of reasons.

I know at the time there was a big debate of people saying that this was SE shifting Ast to a more Geomancer centered style of play, but Ast have never received or even had anything Geomancer related in their kit.

Earthly Star says hi - kind of. Ground targeted effects as an engine for GEOs Terrain-command were a popular suggestion back then (and still are to an extend).
It's not much of a stretch to believe Earthly Star to be early experimentation for that concept.

[SeikishiYuuki]

And they obviously should use the history they already created, I just don't think they should limit themselves to it.
I'd simply prefer for them to come up with a unique concept, both for gameplay and visually, and adjust the lore as necessary. They can do so and have done so before.
For example, while the lore we've got up until now says GEO usually uses Water/Earth/Wind, that might be simply because these elements tend to be the most accessible, but a skilled GEO in the right environment can draw on any element of their choosing. Its just not common knowledge due to the relative rarity of volcanic/frozen/thunderous environments. Fits well enough with GEOs classic theme of using the Environment and explains why we've never seen a GEO use Ice/Fire/Thunder before while leaving the door open for them to be part of the skillset.



Never said AST and GEO were the same thing, lorewise they were always presented as seperate entities. It just always seemed to me like SE originally planned to roll some concepts from GEO into AST rather then make GEO a standalone job, what with Leveva musing about fusing the schools and all.
At least that's always been my theory; though it seems they've abandoned that idea - probably due to player feedback or popular demand for standalone GEO or shift in Healer and/or overall job design or any combination of reasons.



Earthly Star says hi - kind of. Ground targeted effects as an engine for GEOs Terrain-command were a popular suggestion back then (and still are to an extend).
It's not much of a stretch to believe Earthly Star to be early experimentation for that concept.

The only real counter I have to the use of multiple elements is Yoshi P. saying they can't do a Geomancer that actively utilizes the terrain/weather and the class would have to rely on more stable component. (this is not say them using other elements is outside the realm of possibility just specifically terrain weather based ones are unlikely) As to Earthly Star I would not be surprised if this was actually true or not far off. There were dozens of 1.0/2.0 unused abilities that got rehashed and rebuild like ACN's original "Distaff" abilities and its entirely possible it came from there.

I don't think they meant to incorporate Geo into Ast, I mean they might have but it seems more likely the plans they've had to add seem to always go awry and they honestly might just be giving Geo a lore presence because they couldn't find a good playable execution for it within the game at the time.

[ArcaneCarbuncle]

The only real counter I have to the use of multiple elements is Yoshi P. saying they can't do a Geomancer that actively utilizes the terrain/weather and the class would have to rely on more stable component. (this is not say them using other elements is outside the realm of possibility just specifically terrain weather based ones are unlikely) As to Earthly Star I would not be surprised if this was actually true or not far off. There were dozens of 1.0/2.0 unused abilities that got rehashed and rebuild like ACN's original "Distaff" abilities and its entirely possible it came from there.

Well, obviously they wouldn't be able to utilize Terrain/Weather directly, but they could have very well been playing around with mechanics to "create" Weather/Terrain to utilize in the first place. Which is what I was getting at with Earthly Star, since it is already more elaborate than most ground targeted/lingering AoEs. (Besides being inspired by Geomancy from a lore standpoint, iirc)

I don't think they meant to incorporate Geo into Ast, I mean they might have but it seems more likely the plans they've had to add seem to always go awry and they honestly might just be giving Geo a lore presence because they couldn't find a good playable execution for it within the game at the time.

This is of course another possibility, but as I said before, Leveva thinking about ways to combine the concepts (and the story being kind of about combining aspects of both schools) just seems a bit suspicious to me.
Or they were just cannibalizing the concepts they had come up with for the Oracle-type job they were playing with before they decided to make RDM, I can only guess.

[BasicBlake]

character limit

I think they only use those three elements because at some point they were trying very hard to set Onymuji and Geomancer apart (I assume to parallel CNJ and THM). But at this point the line that separates the two seems to fluctuate. They could just have the two cannibalize eachother and just be one straight up eastern entity though and give it to the playerbase. My personal hope is that whatever the playstyle ends up being, I really hope through the use of certain spells/oGCDs they end up able to place fields at their feet that end up having different effects. This way we would still get the feel of terrain manipulation but don't have to place targeted aoe's. (since they seem to not want dps to use those, thank god). And from what they have shown us of the class so far, they aren’t interested in the “all elements” theme. They seem pretty honed in on the name of the class and went full on Feng Shui.

As for the Geo and Ast thing I was commenting on how you said SE was shoehorning Geo into Ast, which I didn't really see. But I do think they probably saw player feedback and really tried to separate the two!

Earthly Star is by no means the first targeted ground ability in the game. I think the tooltip is even something to the effect of you are placing a celestial body on the ground. So while I agree that terrain has played a big role in Geo as a whole, I don't think the placing of Earthly Star was a branch out experiment into the class. Not when we have Asylum, Sacred Soil, HAD Shadowflare and I think Drk gets one as well. Ast just needed a placed aoe healer circle to match the other two healers.

[ArcaneCarbuncle]

I think they only use those three elements because at some point they were trying very hard to set Onymuji and Geomancer apart (I assume to parallel CNJ and THM). But at this point the line that separates the two seems to fluctuate. They could just have the two cannibalize eachother and just be one straight up eastern entity though and give it to the playerbase. My personal hope is that whatever the playstyle ends up being, I really hope through the use of certain spells/oGCDs they end up able to place fields at their feet that end up having different effects. This way we would still get the feel of terrain manipulation but don't have to place targeted aoe's. (since they seem to not want dps to use those, thank god). And from what they have shown us of the class so far, they aren’t interested in the “all elements” theme. They seem pretty honed in on the name of the class and went full on Feng Shui.

The thing is that all they've shown so far is two years or older at this point and was created when they likely weren't planning on making GEO an actual job.
Should they have started/are starting to look into adding GEO as standalone job plenty of things are likely to have changed.
Kyokuho for instance is at best equivalent to what 3.4 Alisaie was to RDM (i.e., a stand-in that has nothing to do with how the job acually plays), and the Geomancer Mobs in Swallows Compass/HoH dont have to mean all that much either seeing as they don't use standard player models/animations. SE could base GEO on them, they could however as easily go the route of the last boss of Amdapor Hard, which teased a bunch of then suspected future WHM Abilities (including Cure 4!) - except none of those abilities ended up being added.
Ultimately I see it this way: Astrologian has been in the game since ARR and the AST we got was vastly different, Gunblades have also been in the game since ARR and Gunbreaker is very different to everything we had seen involving Gunblades before; I'm for one am not comfortable basing my expectations of GEO on stuff that was released over two years ago.
Nor do I want to tbh, and I repeat myself: I'd want them to come up with an interesting, unique concept first and then adjust lore from there, rather then limiting what they can do with the job because lore; and I say this as a lore-aficionado. Obviously I would't want them to outright break anything, I just dont want them to stifle their creativity.

As for the Geo and Ast thing I was commenting on how you said SE was shoehorning Geo into Ast, which I didn't really see. But I do think they probably saw player feedback and really tried to separate the two!

Shoehorning might have been a strong word, but it very much still seems to me like they planned to have AST and GEO linked together rather then create a standalone Geomancer job.

Earthly Star is by no means the first targeted ground ability in the game. I think the tooltip is even something to the effect of you are placing a celestial body on the ground. So while I agree that terrain has played a big role in Geo as a whole, I don't think the placing of Earthly Star was a branch out experiment into the class. Not when we have Asylum, Sacred Soil, HAD Shadowflare and I think Drk gets one as well. Ast just needed a placed aoe healer circle to match the other two healers.

I might not have explained it well, but I never meant to say it was the first ground-targeted AoE, I meant to point out that among that group of abilities it was the most elaborate/unique.
All other similar Abilities simply apply their effect over time to anyone standing within, whereas Earthly Star basically sits one the field doing nothing until you pop it. And then it affects both enemy and ally in different ways.
Of course its possible they made it different just for the sake of being different, but at the same time they could have planned to do more with it at some point in time.
You know, like creating different types of temporary environments to be used by a job that historically used their environment for different effects. Just saying.