


It's both. Summoner has resurrection and isn't taxed as heavily as Red Mage since the toolkit of that job has a raise, has a potent cure, and has a party damage increasing utility skill.
The main difference between the toolkits of both jobs are Vercure and chain raise opportunity.
And the fact physick is literally less than worthless. But let me put it this way - Vercure has nothing to do with RDM's DPS tax outside of using dualcast to use Verraise. And, also, healers were healing just fine in HW back when we had much more complicated DP set-ups and less OGCD heals, so I really don't know how it's possible people think that we -have- to have two or three DPS buttons in a game that is littered with downtime. The vast majority of my GCDs these days are broil 3, and I really wish they weren't. The current state of healers is unacceptable, and if you recently started playing the game and had to deal with the fact you have two DPS spells since LEVEL EIGHT, you'd be pretty pissed too.It's both. Summoner has resurrection and isn't taxed as heavily as Red Mage since the toolkit of that job has a raise, has a potent cure, and has a party damage increasing utility skill.
The main difference between the toolkits of both jobs are Vercure and chain raise opportunity.
Frankly, the problem beginning healers have now is that they think Cure 1/Physick/Benefic are good spells. When they're not. They don't use their much more efficient tools, and you will find that you die to 'pure healers' more often than healers playing properly. That is a simple fact.



Being able to provide potent healing is 100% a raid utility skill, that is my argument. Vercure doesn't have any place in the normal red mage rotation, but for that matter neither does verraise, neither does resurrection for summoner, neither does healing waltz for that matter. But you use them when the situation calls for it, which may be incredibly rare.And the fact physick is literally less than worthless. But let me put it this way - Vercure has nothing to do with RDM's DPS tax outside of using dualcast to use Verraise. And, also, healers were healing just fine in HW back when we had much more complicated DP set-ups and less OGCD heals, so I really don't know how it's possible people think that we -have- to have two or three DPS buttons in a game that is littered with downtime. The vast majority of my GCDs these days are broil 3, and I really wish they weren't. The current state of healers is unacceptable, and if you recently started playing the game and had to deal with the fact you have two DPS spells since LEVEL EIGHT, you'd be pretty pissed too.
Frankly, the problem beginning healers have now is that they think Cure 1/Physick/Benefic are good spells. When they're not. They don't use their much more efficient tools, and you will find that you die to 'pure healers' more often than healers playing properly. That is a simple fact.
If you read my post, I agreed that the current healer damage rotation isn't good. I don't think it should be complicated or a lengthy rotation because of the reasons I put out, but I do think it could have more going for it.
Its 'taxed' less harshly because Summoners Raise is identical to Healer Raises, a 1 minute cooldown Swiftcast and then manual 7 - 10 second casts to get someone up.
Compared to Red Mage, who can Swiftcast a Raise every 5 seconds while also dealing damage (Or Healing if the Healers are the ones who went down) between those Raises.
Or to put it another way, a Red Mage can Raise both dead Tanks and a Dead Healer in the same time as it takes a Summoner to place a Raise on the first dead Tank. The Red Mage sacrifices only the Potency lost in a 2.5s, single GCD window.
Summoner, outside of Swiftcast, loses up to 4 GCDs worth of Potency.
If Red Mage had equal DPS to Black Mage while also being able to Raise half the Full Party in 10 seconds, why would you ever bring a Black Mage?
Same goes for Summoner vs Red Mage.
Constant, instant and low opportunity cost Raising is a VERY powerful tool. Not every run is a perfectly coordinated Static run.
Player
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


