That sounds like a very reasonable approach, as you say it would at least acknowledge the feedback, while not disrupting the content where even small job changes can potentially affect a group's ability to clear. I wish SE had this sensible approach.Yeah, i meant more that there could’ve been ‘between-expansion’ changes that at least make the issues a bit easier to deal with until they can do the bigger ones with expansions.
I get that it would be too weird for them to make change rotations or add a bunch of new skills etc, especially when people are still doing savage/ultimate where proper rotations and the like make a real difference.
But at the same time, one of the most common things I’ve seen people asking for is ‘return healers to Stormblood’. Naturally it would be a bit much to revert their entire kits, but things like giving back old DoTs could still help address those issues a bit, while also making it clearer they’re aware people have them. We’ve seen with Machinist’s Dismantle that it is possible for them to return pre-existing abilities. And even if they didn’t want to return the DoTs themselves, personally I think there’s a good amount of non-offensive options they could choose from as well. Like Scholar’s Eye for an Eye (whether or not it’s affected by Deployment), White Mage’s Stoneskin, or Astrologian’s Disable. Granted two of those were oGCD, but it would at least somewhat address the ‘we have too much powerful/direct healing relative to the content’ issue many healers have
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.