Just a bump to the thread, pretty much everything people dislike about healers as whole has been said twice over.
Also I complained about the state of healers in the 10 year anniversary survey where it asks you about your main job.
Just a bump to the thread, pretty much everything people dislike about healers as whole has been said twice over.
Also I complained about the state of healers in the 10 year anniversary survey where it asks you about your main job.
Thanks for reminding this venue. I'll be doing the same, too.
OP is right on all fronts. I only disagree with some of their solutions but just minor details like keeping synastry instead of neutral sect. I have been playing this game as Scholar since AAR and Endwalker was the first time I put down the book. The role is just garbage to play. I tried Astro since it is at least a little more exciting but it was not enough to keep me interested. I stopped healing completely. That was my main enjoyment in the game. I am not sure if I will come back for Dawntrail if it is going to be the same. It is a joke at this point.
Eh, I didn't. I praised the idea of having different levels of complexity for different people and that I like WHM, WAR, and SMN for their straightforward nature.
So votes cancelling out, I suppose.
I managed to squeeze this thread in as the second question and hopefully in a way relevant to the topic given yoshida is the head of 2 ff games
https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...n-London-Panel
I agree - though I have to confess I still haven't tried any of them yet in any meaningful way!
Personally I just think it's the best solution.
Many players don't want to be forced out of the game to read about the game, and even some who don't mind it don't want highly technical Jobs or needing to spend hours at a target dummy or theorycrafting websites. There are some people that play FF1 as four Fighters or the bog standard Fighter, White Mage, Black Mage, X party. Some people play Mario in Smash or Mario Kart.
For an expansive game, it ultimately should accommodate a lot of different types of players and playstyles, and this is generally going to lead to the best outcome as everyone has something they can enjoy and fit in. This means we should have some crazy complex options and some completely simplistic ones, and it's fine for the game to have both of those, and imo, preferable to the alternative.
Throwing this in here since this seems to be the most relevant topic.
A while back I tried doing a loop of Eukrasian Diagnosis -> Dosis/Dyskrasia until the barrier's broken -> Toxicon in a lv90 dungeon run and it was one of the most fun runs of healing a dungeon I've done. It felt like I was doing a combo befit a healer, but I never did it again since it's far worse than just spamming Dyskrasia while weaving addersgall heals.
So then I've been thinking, why are GCD heals (that aren't lilies, and even that's relatively recent) designed to be a dps loss? I know if a party member's dead that's a worse drop and all, but it still feels like we're being punished for doing what the role is supposed to do.
Instead there’s a situation where I’ve been forced out of the game because I can’t stomach the miserable experience of playing any job I used to enjoy. It’s only getting worse, but I’m not angry enough to care anymore.
Honestly, no idea. Some people think GCD heals being DPS neutral would make healers braindead/too easy/too forgiving/etc. Personally, I think it would be better than the current situation which is 1 button damage spam and oGCD weave healing and would offer a solution to get healers pressing other buttons and actually raise the active skill ceiling since you'd need to be able to figure out how to work out cast times to heal people and manage MP. But there are a lot of people that don't like that, who like planning out fights with oGCD healing plans for a more strategic gameplay than a tactical, "moment to moment" healing gameplay, and due to being bored with the one button damage that results from the oGCD healing plan, want more damage buttons/a dps rotation on all the healers.So then I've been thinking, why are GCD heals (that aren't lilies, and even that's relatively recent) designed to be a dps loss? I know if a party member's dead that's a worse drop and all, but it still feels like we're being punished for doing what the role is supposed to do.
Personally, I think the GCD healing and tactical gameplay is more fun and the right answer, but I get not everyone likes that, so I think having some healers that work with each would be the best answer, like say SCH having more damage buttons and oGCD/Faerie healing while WHM has more GCD healing and Misery refunding damage (like if all GCD heals contributed to the Blood Lily, not just Solace/Rapture). Other people want all the healers to be more like damage dealer rotations and keep the oGCD weaving/planned out entire encounter gameplay.
As for what the Devs are thinking, I'm not sure. You're right the healing/damage combo style of thing feels more fun (WHM could do it via Misery, SGE via Toxicon), though. They could even do two and two with AST/SCH being more oGCD focused and WHM/SGE being more GCD focused with damage neutral GCD heals. No reason not to, really. It's just a question of the Devs deciding if they'd want to to it.
...and that's why the 4 Healers Model would be a good idea. Well, ANOTHER reason why it would be a good idea.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.