SUGGESTION: Lockout changes

[DrWho2010]

smh at this whole thread. the system works as is. as always people want to advocate getting too stronger faster and getting more and more rewards quicker because selfishness. the system exists for a reason. to keep you playing and coming back week after week (even if it's just once a week to raid log). anything else would lead to people gearing up too quickly and even less people playing.

[Colt47]

smh at this whole thread. the system works as is. as always people want to advocate getting too stronger faster and getting more and more rewards quicker because selfishness. the system exists for a reason. to keep you playing and coming back week after week (even if it's just once a week to raid log). anything else would lead to people gearing up too quickly and even less people playing.

It's fine to have some sandbags in the way of the progress. But do you really think that something like having your own personal lockout impact others and harming their progress is reasonable? Everything else in the game seems to bend the other way and encourage people to work together. Savage is the only system that works contrary to it and it's not really about difficulty of the content. It's more about how they did the reward system in an attempt to encourage the formation of static groups where it didn't need to exist.

[Kuroka]

smh at this whole thread. the system works as is. as always people want to advocate getting too stronger faster and getting more and more rewards quicker because selfishness. the system exists for a reason. to keep you playing and coming back week after week (even if it's just once a week to raid log). anything else would lead to people gearing up too quickly and even less people playing.

Yes and now you have what feels like 70% the ppl barely gear out one job, even now with yorha unlocked and eden stuff for months and free relic. I can only play one job but ffs let me gear 2, bc i wanna have some more reasons to log more then once a week... (for the record, i do log basically every day and do stuff but still...)


"Go and play smt else or nothing meanwhile" is nevera good answer, bc if i play smt else, loose track, I for sure wont return ever, even less after loosing my house and FC.

[DrWho2010]

"Go and play smt else or nothing meanwhile" is nevera good answer, bc if i play smt else, loose track, I for sure wont return ever, even less after loosing my house and FC.

then why is it Yoshi-p keeps using that answer? he advocates taking breaks. follow his advice.

[Liam_Harper]

smh at this whole thread. the system works as is. as always people want to advocate getting too stronger faster and getting more and more rewards quicker because selfishness. the system exists for a reason. to keep you playing and coming back week after week (even if it's just once a week to raid log). anything else would lead to people gearing up too quickly and even less people playing.

It has nothing to do with selfishness. Most of us just want to raid with our friends/FC without drastically cutting their loot down because we cleared that week. We'd be fine getting nothing. I organize Savage in my FC personally, where we have 10-12 interested and that often means 0 chests for 3 people each week.

The system works but it could be refined. A chance for chests not to appear scaling with the number of players who cleared that week, combined with being ineligible for loot after your first kill of the week, would be a nice QoL.

[Kuroka]

It has nothing to do with selfishness. Most of us just want to raid with our friends/FC without drastically cutting their loot down because we cleared that week. We'd be fine getting nothing. I organize Savage in my FC personally, where we have 10-12 interested and that often means 0 chests for 3 people each week

Just like at Eureka where ppl either started with you or you could not help em at all, not even with later on with the logs... I just cant accept such limits bc of some ppl, all must suffer.