Volume 2 page 79
A Forgotten Past:
"Regrettably, there is little to no information concerning Hingashi prior to the Forth Astral Era. Extant Allagan records currently available for study make no mention of the islands either. Therefore, it must be assumed that while the Allagan Empire ruled the Three Great Continents at the height of its power, it's dominion did not extend to what would be later known as Hingashi. This presumption is further supported by the fact that, in the limited archaeological surveys of the island undertaken with the permission of the bakufu, not a single Allagan ruin has been discovered. That is not to say there was no evidence of Allagan influence whatsoever, though, as small artefacts such as jewelry and tombstones were unearthed.
The prevailing theory at this time is that the islands were either deserted or home to only a token population prior to the Forth Umbral Calamity, at which point refugees fleeing the collapse of the Empire came en masse. The Allagan trinkets found in Hingashi were brought by these new arrivals, who subsequently cast off the last vestiges of their fallen society and strove to create a new one free from the trappings of the past. Again, it should be stressed that this is a theory based on limited evidence, and it should not be taken as incontrovertible fact."
So basically Hingashi was never part of the Empire and became populated after the Forth Umbral Calamity. If you want to say Meracydians populated it your free to but a person saying people fled from Aldenard populated it instead is equally right, there is very little evidence for any prevailing theory, so long as it meets the requirements of the people who came to populate Hingashi had Allagen trinkets(More likely refugees from the Three Great Continents than the recently conquered Meracydians at the time but that is just a theory.)
I may be more supporting Sharlayan but I never ruled out Meracydia, as after ShB I just can't rule anything out, but I did also note that if we do go to Sharlayan it would have a split focus with the Garlean Empire, which is looking like it is coming to the forefront (HW continuously teased Aka Mhigo every patch with Yda and Papalymo, something ShB has been doing with Garlemald).



Ala Mhigo wasn't brought up until 3.4, when Yda and Papalymo stepped back onto the stage after Teledji Adeledji's antics branded all the Scions outlaws. 3.1 - 3.3 dealt exclusively with social unrest in Ishgard and defeating Nidhogg to reach the True End of the Dragonsong War.
Again, recent GameSpot interview hints expectations will be subverted and we won't be going to Garlemald. (Pertinent part copypasted below.)
GS:Are we going to be in Garlemald soon? We've seen a little bit of it in story moments with Estinien and Gaius but are we going to start seeing more and actually going there?
Yoshi-P:In that aspect, I think we'll be able to go against players' expectations in a good way. Content that's coming in the patch 5.3 series, there's the Sorrow of Werlyt, the latest installment in the weapon series, where you're actually fighting against the forces of the Garlean Empire. In Save the Queen, the Bozjan Southern Front is an upcoming instance that really touches upon the Garlean Empire.
Of course, it's not quite the main story but it is a pretty significant story...
Make of that what you will.
Trpimir Ratyasch's Way Status (7.5 - End)
[ ]LOST [ ]NOT LOST [X]ALREADY MISSING REAL SPHENE
"There is no hope in stubbornly clinging to the past. It is our duty to face the future and march onward, not retreat inward." -Sovetsky Soyuz, Azur Lane: Snowrealm Peregrination


Actually, Yda and Papalymo's story starts at the end of 3.1, although it's not really explicitly said, the player recognizes where they are and what they are talking about. 3.2 shows the Griffon. I don't remember the patch but there is also a similar scene where Papalymo drops that hint that Yda is in fact Lyse.
It's faint, but it is continuous. (And that's why people were a bit let down that there was so much more about Doma than Ala Mhigo, because Doma comes in only in 3.55 I think)
I'll agree that 4.X teasing was more going towards Garlemald than another Shard, even if we did strike the Empire somehow while taking down Emet Selch. But in the current state, the Garlean Empire could be kind of put aside for some time. There are civil wars, there is Werlyt and there is Bozja. And if I may, why would we need to go there? Our action is only defending Eorzea and liberating nations. But I don't see us pushing the offense in Illsabard.
They could just write some kind of ongoing diplomacy going on once we have significantly weakened the Empire's aggressive stance (which could be as early as the end of 5.X), like something like helping the Populares getting more power (as we have done a bit). Making that threat tamed to focus on something else.





Domans storyline came into play in 2.1. Then they're an active part of MSQ plotlines all the way up to the end of HW, where Gosetsu shows up. It wasn't really a matter of if we would go to Doma but when, and so it didn't need as much of a build up in HW.
I think people were really only disappointed with less Ala Mhigo, because most of the leveling and build up takes place in the Far Eastern zones, where the Ala Mhigan ones are the bread to good part of the sandwich. In fact that's a really apt comparison when looking at zone design. Ala Mhigo basically all desert and sandstone with a little garnish. Far East zones colorful and vibrant, stand out in a crowd sort of places.
Personally, I'm hoping that "brush up on Heavensward" actually means "remember all that unused space in Azys Lla?"
あっきれた。


In regards to Garlemald:
My thinking is, the Empire storyline and the Ascian storyline have diverged. While the Ascians are responsible for literally everything wrong with the world in XIV, including constructing the Empire in its entirety, 99% of the Empire is unaware of the Ascians' influence, particularly during Stormblood. The warmachine of the Empire has become an engine of destruction in its own right, which continues with infighting, conquering outlying nations, and the creation of Weapons even after the Ascians have fled the stage.
Shadowbringers was the point in the story that said "The Ascians no longer have a part in the Empire. The Empire is independent. And the Empire is still horrible." Even if we kill Elidibus, the Empire will exist as a separate violent entity until we go to Garlemald; even if we nuked Garlemald from orbit tomorrow, we would still have to deal with Elidibus and his remaining Ascian lackeys separately who might take advantage of such a Calamity. Dealing with one doesn't necessarily mean simultaneously ending the other threat - and in classic Final Fantasy fashion, finally dealing with one would really only make the other worse.
Now remember, this is an MMO: until the devs say "we're retiring the game, this is the final expansion/patch/whatever," there needs to be an engine of conflict to keep players not only coming back, but pushing into new regions.
The Ascians are on their last legs. We already have a hint of what is to come when Zodiark is gone. The only contribution the Ascians have left now is finishing them off completely. They are not that engine.
Considering Garlemald has been the driving force of the players' involvement for most of the story and the impetus of many of our pushes into new locations (including the entirety of Stormblood, the Black Rose threat sending us to the First, even helping motivate Thordan's counter-militarization), it seems unlikely the devs would remove Garlemald from the stage until they were prepared to replace it with an entirely new threat to serve as the driving force for the rest of XIV's lifetime.
For the WoW Refugees, Garlemald is like the Sargeras and the Burning Legion. This omnicidal conquering force that's constantly on the horizon, the threat of which served to motivate the Old Horde, the Illidari, the Scourge, and several player faction leaders; Sargeras has been a driving force of conflict for the entire Warcraft story. "Legion" was known as the "in case of emergency, break glass" expansion, because it was finally tying up many of the story threads that had been built for decades.
Unfortunately, breaking that glass also led to several hasty pushes to set up new enemies after the Burning Legion was gone, turning each expansion into a case of dealing with standalone threats as soon as they pop up, which is why WoW's player count has since dropped like a stone. Now that players have explored the entire known world of Azeroth, the only places to go are other worlds (where we can't even chase the threats we were invested in stopping when we started the game), or revamps on old content.
By contrast, Hydaelyn still has a lot to offer on its own surface.
In a practical sense, Garlemald would have to either be the final expansion, or be dealt with to clean the slate for a new power to take its place on the board. In order for that new power to take over in a satisfying matter, where the player doesn't just roll their eyes and go "great, we're playing whack-a-mole now," there needs to be satisfying setup well in advance -- something Final Fantasy has done very well for decades. Kefka killed Emperor Gestahl to set up the World of Ruin, Sephiroth killed President Shinra to set up Jenova, Ardyn cannibalized Niflheim to begin the Long Night, and so on.
(If you follow that trend, we have a potential setup being started with Zenos, but what makes Zenos a bad choice for this on his own is that he's a very short-sighted villain with no interest in conquering new nations or ruling from afar. Even if he attained godhood like Kefka, he wouldn't be interested in it to rule the cosmos, he would just want something to fight.)
But most importantly, the criteria for this hypothetical post-Garlemald power needs to include something that would push players into other regions of the world. Why would we later want to go to Thavnair or the New World, for instance, without the Empire as something to chase or push us there?
Last edited by Archwizard; 08-02-2020 at 09:21 AM.



In replaying 5.2 on one of my characters, I had a thought that may be revealed once 5.3 comes out re: who we really are. I'll get my tin foil on now, because this is just wild, rampant theories that may or may not be correct or have merit.
We know that we were friends with the Convocation, and that we are most likely the Defector, bringing the Convocation count from 14 to 13. In the scenes out of Anamnesis Anyder, Venat's group is also 13, and if we had chosen to side with them, we would be 14 there. There's always the possibility that there were more people who sided with Venat in their decision to summon a counter to Zodiark and were in their own "Convocation" of sorts, but I find it interesting that there's 13 present in that scene.
We also know that Elidibus is just a title of "emissary" and that the original decided to become Zodiark's heart, and the one we see now is just their successor in that job... but what if there were more than one? What if we were in that same vocation before we became the WoL? We ended up becoming Hydaelyn's Chosen™ because of starshowers and Her talking to us etc but I'm fairly certain Hydaelyn knew who we were when She decided to make us the WoL, most likely how Lahabrea and all them knew who we were. We're already kind of an "emissary", an ambassador, as Chai-Nuzz balks at the fact that we brought "just about everyone in bally Norvrandt" to help before we climb up Mt. Gulg.
We're Elidibus. Or one of them. An Elidibus that ended up being an emissary for Hydaelyn as opposed to Zodiark, bringing people together as an ambassador for Hydaelyn - for Venat. For Minfilia (if my own speculation on Venat's "I will retain the form of my choosing" and how Minfilia is awfully close to Hydaelyn to be chosen by her to be her own voice is correct.... HMMMM.) Our friends.
God why isn't it the 11th already so I can punch Elidibus out of my ghost boyfriend already, see how correct/wildly wrong I am and save the rest of my friends augh.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|