Job soulstones

[Crushnight]

Could you add them to the recommended gear button if they are unequipped please, might help allieviate some people from being classes rather than jobs.

[Hasrat]

I doubt the coding would allow for it. Biggest hurdle would be the SMN/SCH split.

[CazzT]

I'm not sure this is even necessary anyway. I can't honestly recall the last time I saw someone without the soulstone that was over level 30. And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

[Avidria]

I'm not sure this is even necessary anyway. I can't honestly recall the last time I saw someone without the soulstone that was over level 30. And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

Had a LotA run a few weeks ago with two conjurers who did not comment when asked why they were conjurers kinda funny and didn't matter at all because LotA could be facerolled by my pet cats, but still

Anyway it's possible I don't see the harm in it

[TheMightyMollusk]

I'm not sure this is even necessary anyway. I can't honestly recall the last time I saw someone without the soulstone that was over level 30. And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

I had a party in Orbonne when it was current that had a gladiator, a conjurer, two archers, and a lancer. There's no justification for it beyond trolling.

[CazzT]

I had a party in Orbonne when it was current that had a gladiator, a conjurer, two archers, and a lancer. There's no justification for it beyond trolling.

Where was I justifying it? Pointing out a scenario is not justifying it. Why do people twist things so much on these forums?

[TheMightyMollusk]

Where was I justifying it? Pointing out a scenario is not justifying it. Why do people twist things so much on these forums?

Um.

And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

I was agreeing with you.

[CazzT]

Um.
I was agreeing with you.

My apologies, then. I've had several occasions on these forums where people completely misunderstood what I was saying and twisted it into something else. Apparently what I did with your reply to me. Time for some beer.

[Gemina]

I haven't seen this happen since HW, and if it did I am quite sure that player would promptly be kicked from the group. SB made it so players no longer have to level another class as a requisite to unlocking soulstones on their main job.

It would actually be easier for the devs to design the duty finder so it prompts the player that their soulstone is not equipped in duties lv30+, very much the same way it does when your gear condition is very low.

[Duskane]

Jobs stones should just go away and if you don't do the PLD,WAR etc etc job quest you cap at lvl 35 till you do them