Delita Attire

[Allegor]

Ehh, unless I'm missing something, isn't that just a golden version of the Lighthouse fending set? If so, it'd be better to ask for a dyable version of it as a future dungeon or craftable set, since it's technically already in the game.

[RyuSaarva]

male outfits already drop from the instances itself.

[Tsukino]

If no one bought anything from the Mog Station they would have closed the damned thing and we'd have everything in there included in our subscriptions. Everyone who pays for microtransactions is part of a very big problem here and elsewhere.

[VenKitsune]

If no one bought anything from the Mog Station they would have closed the damned thing and we'd have everything in there included in our subscriptions. Everyone who pays for microtransactions is part of a very big problem here and elsewhere.

Which is why i made mention of it that we should really stop asking for things to be added to the mogstation, and instead ask them to add it in a general request.

"Can we have this outfit available to wear?"

or

"Can you put this outfit that is already in the game files i've downloaded, on the mogstation, so i can pay the equivalent of a full tank of petrol for it?"

le sigh


Like the Bennu mount for example - It should of just been added to T13 as a drop like all the current raid tiers - It would reinvigorate interest in the content and give people a reason to farm it....Buuuut nope, apparently, just add it to the mogstation and charge £25 and nobody bats and eye, apparently. Not to mention the Bunnu mount is just a reskin of an existing mount you can get for free. Its stupid.

[MelodyCrystel]

But you 'glorious' Anti-Mogstation-people DO realize, that the devs will most likely give you less stuff to glamour / play with when your hated pay-service vanishes, yes? Less money-income means less resources means more things will get cut.

[SturmChurro]

But you 'glorious' Anti-Mogstation-people DO realize, that the devs will most likely give you less stuff to glamour / play with when your hated pay-service vanishes, yes? Less money-income means less resources means more things will get cut.

That's the right of it. If the mogstation was cut, we would see more things cut, or never added to the game than ever before. People should be thanking the whales. Don't get me wrong there is a balance, but this game handles it's cash shop well.

[Eli85]

That's the right of it. If the mogstation was cut, we would see more things cut, or never added to the game than ever before. People should be thanking the whales. Don't get me wrong there is a balance, but this game handles it's cash shop well.

This is a very silly take.

By all numerical accounts and reports, XIV has been growing rapidly — in terms of interest and subscribers — over the last few expansions. However, the rate of content added to the game has not kept up with the monetary growth of the game. So this idea that, if the Mog Station was cut out, that more in-game content would be cut is ludicrous. The profits from the Mog Station do not go back into XIV; it goes back to Square-Enix, who then invests into non-XIV enterprises.

The Mog Station is not going away, that's true enough, but let's drop this narrative that it means more investment or content in the game. Square-Enix's track record is to keep the game profitable, but only to funnel those profits into other enterprises.

[Neoom]

But you 'glorious' Anti-Mogstation-people DO realize, that the devs will most likely give you less stuff to glamour / play with when your hated pay-service vanishes, yes? Less money-income means less resources means more things will get cut.

As someone who plays games with lootbox system that you have to pay real money for, I love Mog station so much. Imagine paying say, 20 (what ever currency you use) for few boxes you can't even guarantee you get the item you want from vs. paying 20 (again what ever currency) to get the exact item you want with no RGN in the purchase. As much as I would love to not always use real money aside from the sub payment, the more people use Mog station the more items we get.

[VenKitsune]

But you 'glorious' Anti-Mogstation-people DO realize, that the devs will most likely give you less stuff to glamour / play with when your hated pay-service vanishes, yes? Less money-income means less resources means more things will get cut.

but they, in general atleast arent making NEW stuff for mogstation. It's all existing outfits and mounts etc that are already in the game to begin with, the only difference is that they're making it available to be used by players that pay stupid sums.

If mogstation didn't exist, we would of still gotten yshtola's and kriles outfits eventually, for example, because they're already in the game and there was demand for it. Using the mogstation's existence for why things on it are good is not a good justification.

[Clover_Blake]

If mogstation didn't exist, we would of still gotten yshtola's and kriles outfits eventually, for example, because they're already in the game and there was demand for it. Using the mogstation's existence for why things on it are good is not a good justification.

No, we wouldn't. And if we did, it'd be at the expense of any other set. Cashshop items are made with extra resources, as far as I know.