Why was the Alma attire from the Ivalice raid series released on Mog Station but nothing for male characters from Ivalice? Can we please have Delita attire for the male character players who care about glamour?
Thanks, Devs!
Why was the Alma attire from the Ivalice raid series released on Mog Station but nothing for male characters from Ivalice? Can we please have Delita attire for the male character players who care about glamour?
Thanks, Devs!
I'd like to see it added as well!
How about no? Have we really gotten to the point of requesting things to be added to a cash shop? Don't ask for it on the mogstation, ask for it as an in-game or veteran reward, not as a microtransaction. Honestly these threads asking for things specifically being added to the cash shop is starting to make me wonder if people hate microtransactions as much as they say - We already pay a subscription.
2.0 Veteran from 2013. Just looking to be helpful. DRK is Love, DRK is life.
(Ignore the levels on my character card, the tool i used to make it hasn't been updated for 4.0)
I'd take the mogstation over Bluehole, EA, and ubisoft anyday. Atleast the mogstation gives you the item with no fuse. All you need is the cash, no lootcrates, boxes or stupid loopholes on NOT giving you the item you want. And to be honest, there's more chances to that being put into the store then the game anyway. Since the mogstation crew is completely different from the game. They most likely literally look for things to sale and go to get them approved, marketing pretty much.How about no? Have we really gotten to the point of requesting things to be added to a cash shop? Don't ask for it on the mogstation, ask for it as an in-game or veteran reward, not as a microtransaction. Honestly these threads asking for things specifically being added to the cash shop is starting to make me wonder if people hate microtransactions as much as they say - We already pay a subscription.
And your sub isn't doing anything but giving you access to the playroom. It has never and doesn't pay for the extra costumes like the one he's asking to be put in. That money has to come from somewhere. So unless you want to pay more for your sub so it CAN pay for that stuff... the cashshop is here to stay.
Last edited by Canada_bangs; 03-10-2020 at 01:25 PM.
My point is this.I'd take the mogstation over Bluehole, EA, and ubisoft anyday. Atleast the mogstation gives you the item with no fuse. All you need is the cash, no lootcrates, boxes or stupid loopholes on NOT giving you the item you want. And to be honest, there's more chances to that being put into the store then the game anyway. Since the mogstation crew is completely different from the game. They most likely literally look for things to sale and go to get them approved, marketing pretty much.
And your sub isn't doing anything but giving you access to the playroom. It has never and doesn't pay for the extra costumes like the one he's asking to be put in. That money has to come from somewhere. So unless you want to pay more for your sub so it CAN pay for that stuff... the cashshop is here to stay.
First, we should ask for something to be even added to the game first and foremost. If they say no, due to any reason including "We wouldn't know how to distribute it to players" THEN that's when you ask for it as a mogstation item because that'll perk up the ears of the investors. You dont just jump straight to the nuclear option straight away when at the end of the day we could of gotten a lot of items currently on the mogstation if we asked nicely for them as rewards for in-game content first.
And yes, while its technically true that the sub only gives access to the actual game...The way mogstation behaves and is priced is aweful considering the sub, The current mogstation would be more at home on a free to play or buy to play MMO, not a subscription one.
Read above
Perhaps so, but there shouldn't even be female gender locked items on the mogstation to begin with, that's not an excuse.
Plus, the fact that its the only main revenue stream back to the actual budget of the game should not only not be our concern at all as customers and consumers considering THEY'RE the ones that introduced it as such and not us, but its also very likely a myth - The game is developed and published by the same company, with all their websites hosted on the same servers, i very much doubt that the investors and shareholders dont even get to touch mogstation mony at all because "oh well its for the game, you cant have it"
Let me put it this way - Which would you prefer?
A) The new Y'Shtola garb/Krile garb being a drop from a fate, NM or other piece of content, perhaps even as a reward for the new Ishguard restoration leaderboards.
OR
B) Paying 2x the cost of the base game, or about 3 months worth of sub time for it to be delivered to you via mogmail.
Hm?
Last edited by VenKitsune; 03-11-2020 at 03:56 PM.
2.0 Veteran from 2013. Just looking to be helpful. DRK is Love, DRK is life.
(Ignore the levels on my character card, the tool i used to make it hasn't been updated for 4.0)
There are tons and tons of requests for things to be added into the game. The team seems to be swamped otherwise we would have things like viera hair, or male viera/female hrothgar. Yeah, just asking for an item in general is probably the best way to approach a request, but a requested item appearing on the mogstation is much more likely. Plus these kind of items seem to appear regularly on the mogstation, so there is already a pattern. So understandable people would jump to it first off.My point is this.
First, we should ask for something to be even added to the game first and foremost. If they say no, due to any reason including "We wouldn't know how to distribute it to players" THEN that's when you ask for it as a mogstation item because that'll perk up the ears of the investors. You dont just jump straight to the nuclear option straight away when at the end of the day we could of gotten a lot of items currently on the mogstation if we asked nicely for them as rewards for in-game content first.
And yes, while its technically true that the sub only gives access to the actual game...The way mogstation behaves and is priced is aweful considering the sub, The current mogstation would be more at home on a free to play or buy to play MMO, not a subscription one.
I completely disagree with this. The mogstation would be a sorry excuse for a cash shop if this was free to play, or buy to play.
Let me put it this way. The Y'shtola garb/Krile garb wouldn't exist without the mogstation. Nor would a lot of this game for that matter. The mogstation supposedly directly funds the devlopment of the game, I think we all enjoy.Let me put it this way - Which would you prefer?
A) The new Y'Shtola garb/Krile garb being a drop from a fate, NM or other piece of content, perhaps even as a reward for the new Ishguard restoration leaderboards.
OR
B) Paying 2x the cost of the base game, or about 3 months worth of sub time for it to be delivered to you via mogmail.
Hm?
Last edited by SturmChurro; 03-11-2020 at 04:05 PM.
WHM | RDM | DNC
If I am remembering correctly, mogstation has a separate team, so anything added to that doesn't (shouldn't) hinder the game's development. Plus weren't they doing away with veteran rewards? At least that's what I've read people say here.How about no? Have we really gotten to the point of requesting things to be added to a cash shop? Don't ask for it on the mogstation, ask for it as an in-game or veteran reward, not as a microtransaction. Honestly these threads asking for things specifically being added to the cash shop is starting to make me wonder if people hate microtransactions as much as they say - We already pay a subscription.
I like the mogstation for what it is, I see it as a bonus. It's doesn't even have that many items compared to most other mmos, and it's not even in the game, so you don't get advertisements. ESO dumps adverts on you when you log in, to see their new "deals".
WHM | RDM | DNC
I forgot about ESO.. they are the WORST. Tho Ubisoft comes to my mind first since I play Tom Clancey's The Division.If I am remembering correctly, mogstation has a separate team, so anything added to that doesn't (shouldn't) hinder the game's development. Plus weren't they doing away with veteran rewards? At least that's what I've read people say here.
I like the mogstation for what it is, I see it as a bonus. It's doesn't even have that many items compared to most other mmos, and it's not even in the game, so you don't get advertisements. ESO dumps adverts on you when you log in, to see their new "deals".
If I'm remembering correctly the MogStation is also the main if not only source of revenue that goes right back to the game and does not get funneled into anything else. So they aren't going to stop putting such items into the MS if they can help it.How about no? Have we really gotten to the point of requesting things to be added to a cash shop? Don't ask for it on the mogstation, ask for it as an in-game or veteran reward, not as a microtransaction. Honestly these threads asking for things specifically being added to the cash shop is starting to make me wonder if people hate microtransactions as much as they say - We already pay a subscription.
Also, if they insist on putting gender locked female outfits into the cash shop, it's only fair that the guys get something too.
Subscriptions only pay for access to the servers and server upkeep, not the content within. If it was the case of "we pay a subscription so we should have access to everything" then why do we pay for the expansions when they come out?How about no? Have we really gotten to the point of requesting things to be added to a cash shop? Don't ask for it on the mogstation, ask for it as an in-game or veteran reward, not as a microtransaction. Honestly these threads asking for things specifically being added to the cash shop is starting to make me wonder if people hate microtransactions as much as they say - We already pay a subscription.
The only items I'm against being on the cash shop are the seasonal items.
Last edited by Joven; 03-11-2020 at 03:41 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.