SCH need buffs

[Seraphor]

My problem is just that I have to sacrifice healing for the sake of damage which I don't on WHM and WHM is already stronger on top of that. Quite the opposite healing = more damage on WHM.
I don't think that it's an interesting decision, especially when the healing and damage isn't even that impressive to begin with.
I also don't really see the problem with '' wasted resources '', if anything it'd just incentivize you to use your healing Aether spenders more often instead of sitting on them.

Maybe in dungeons in smaller pulls it'd be a problem but I don't think so in endgame content.
I mean in dungeons I have to throw out Lily's as to not cap out just for the sake of doing it something too.

Sure, you could just spend the extra Aetherflow it on a Lustrate, but SCH players complained that wasn't interesting enough and too similar to WHM's new kit without the feed-in towards dps (Misery)

[Mhaeric]

Sure, you could just spend the extra Aetherflow it on a Lustrate, but SCH players complained that wasn't interesting enough and too similar to WHM's new kit without the feed-in towards dps (Misery)

And most of the time you didn't need the Lustrate, so you were either sitting on Aetherflow stacks, wasting a stack on a healing ability that did nothing or overwriting the stacks with new ones.

[EaMett]

And most of the time you didn't need the Lustrate, so you were either sitting on Aetherflow stacks, wasting a stack on a healing ability that did nothing or overwriting the stacks with new ones.

You generally wouldn't even Aetherflow unless you had an open weaving window in bio. In the early days of titania ex and emanation ex, before we got ED back, you would essentially not use AF much if at all. It would always be off cooldown with stacks to spare and the faerie covered most of the healing. Not only that but it totally negated dissipation since you never had any upside to having extra stacks. We complained about many things and ED is the only thing they gave us back. It was for a reason.