Amaurot in design is fine, the main problem is your ilvl is synced to 430, so it's impossible to clear it fast. It should just be 470 like the rest.


Amaurot in design is fine, the main problem is your ilvl is synced to 430, so it's impossible to clear it fast. It should just be 470 like the rest.




See I'd take Amaurot over the hell that was Toto-rak almost every day for several months back in HW. I still get irrationally annoyed any time it pops up in the roulette these days because of how many times the roulette plopped me in there back then - even though it's practically a brain dead affair these days.
Would it be a roulette then?
Roulettes in general need more options, not fewer. (The only removal I'd be behind is the removal of EX trials from mentor roulette; they either belong in their own roulette or not at all.)
Level 80 roulette right now is going to be weighted heavily toward Amaurot because it's the only dungeon in the bunch required for story.
In general though, if the 80 roulette has a "1/3" chance of giving you a dungeon you don't want to run, you might be best off simply not running that roulette.


Yes, just like the trials roulette is still a roulette despite not including Amaurot. Letting players avoid specific dungeons isn't going to cause the entire system to collapse. Participation may even increase if people didn't have to worry about being placed in their least favorite content. If certain dungeons are really despised by the majority, a separate option could be added to the duty finder to prioritize queuing into first timer dungeons or unpopular dungeons in return for more XP/tomes/whatever.




It's far more likely queues would become unbearably longer for certain dungeons than increase. If you could veto five dungeons from Leveling, I can all but guarantee which ones would be picked.Yes, just like the trials roulette is still a roulette despite not including Amaurot. Letting players avoid specific dungeons isn't going to cause the entire system to collapse. Participation may even increase if people didn't have to worry about being placed in their least favorite content. If certain dungeons are really despised by the majority, a separate option could be added to the duty finder to prioritize queuing into first timer dungeons or unpopular dungeons in return for more XP/tomes/whatever.
Sastasha
Copper Bell
Toto-rak
Tam-tara
Aurum Vale
And therein lies the problem. Four of them are story required, which means new players could be waiting hours. Amaurot would have a similar problem simply because of the ilvl sync.
"Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls and ask the ghosts if honor matters."
"The silence is your answer."



You don't have to run a roulette, imagine that concept.
So many ways to get tomes in this game now.


What if you couldn't pick 5?
There are ways to get around this, I mentioned one in the second half of my quote. It's really only a problem in your example because the number of vetos you used is enough to cover all of the most unpopular dungeons, and that's assuming the dungeons you listed really are the only ones people would avoid. As with the Alliance Roulette, players will queue for leveling expecting different things. Some people only care about getting the reward, they might choose to skip The Vault or Doma Castle over Sastasha and Copper Bell.And therein lies the problem. Four of them are story required, which means new players could be waiting hours. Amaurot would have a similar problem simply because of the ilvl sync.



I got Toto-rak 8 times in a row leveling an alt. Luckily my party was understanding when I let a little grievance slip.See I'd take Amaurot over the hell that was Toto-rak almost every day for several months back in HW. I still get irrationally annoyed any time it pops up in the roulette these days because of how many times the roulette plopped me in there back then - even though it's practically a brain dead affair these days.


What are you dying instantly at..?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




