It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[SamSmoot]

I just wear tome gear, and if I don't like the looks of it, I glamour it with a universal weathered shepherd's set.
The glamour system is such a pain to deal with that I just bother trying to make new sets.

[KeshLives]

I mean I get it. Though that’s part of the experience, you don’t have to like everyone you meet.

I mean, do I really 'want' to see a dude in a tanga and cowboy boots and a hat running around in my dungeon? Nah. Do I care enough to want to exclude him from my view? No. It's simply not something that I think needs 'added to the game'. More ways of excluding others from the game are not a good thing, imo.
YMMV.

[Atelier-Bagur]

No because then youll miss out on actual good gear glams and I dont want to punish my senses from not ever seeing good fashion just because theres some people out there with meme glams.

[Joven]

I mean, do I really 'want' to see a dude in a tanga and cowboy boots and a hat running around in my dungeon? Nah. Do I care enough to want to exclude him from my view? No. It's simply not something that I think needs 'added to the game'. More ways of excluding others from the game are not a good thing, imo.
YMMV.

How exactly are you "excluding others" from the game by using an entirely client side feature?

[Bobby66]

With unholy powers I have found a way to create my ideal, and it is glorious.

[ASkellington]

Whelp, seeing as this got necro'd and is going to be on the front page for a few days...

Also putting in my two gil: Does it really matter if we have this feature or not? My main is a male healer. I'm going to be wearing dress and heels any way.

[SassyAssassin]

I want to see all your glams, ugly as they are :3
People take their time to roll those 2B leggins up for us, best we can do for them is stare back where the sun doesn’t shine.

[Zebraoracle]

Except now you're dictating what people can and cannot do with their own devices.

How exactly is "leaving things the way they are" dictating what people can and cannot do with their own devices?

I mean, do I really 'want' to see a dude in a tanga and cowboy boots and a hat running around in my dungeon? Nah. Do I care enough to want to exclude him from my view? No. It's simply not something that I think needs 'added to the game'. More ways of excluding others from the game are not a good thing, imo.
YMMV.

I'm not sure how people are getting excluded, but generally, yes, I agree with this. It's just an unnecessary dev attention that's better spent on something else. And again, if it's in the game, it's free to use.

[Joven]

How exactly is "leaving things the way they are" dictating what people can and cannot do with their own devices?

You're saying people shouldn't be allowed an option that only they themselves would see.

[Zebraoracle]

You're saying people shouldn't be allowed an option that only they themselves would see.

That's not what I'm saying at all?

I said it's close to dangerous territory and is similar to modding situations some people would really frown upon.