


That model, iirc, is reused for the Sigmascape-tier tome weapons.



I suppose.
The thing i've thought to justify the reuse, other than for TEA models, is "had GNB/DNC been implemented with RDM/SAM/DRK/AST/MCH, would that model have been reused at the same time anyways?" Like, every job gets weapons from dohn mheg that're reskinned of castrum abania. Every weapon from Ala Mhigo is a recolor of the Shisui weapons, etc etc. In that context then it makes sense for the models to be reused.
Still it's lazy when you consider No UwU/UCoB/ARR primals/HW Trials/SB Trials (sans ShinEX)/Alexander raid weapons/Delta and Sigmascape weapons/Lost Allagan weapons...
Huh. I'm sure there's more that I'm missing, like I don't recall if GNB/DNC got the Ala Mhigan weapons (what're now bought via centurio seals next to the hunt board in rhalgr's, for example, and whose armor models get reused with job swapped palettes in malikah's well... but i digress), but when you spell it all out like that... it's quite a lot. Designing, redesigning, modeling, texturing, testing, reredesigning, eventually implementing; all whilst other things need that same workflow.
Not playing devil's advocate here but In light of that, yeah, it shows SE did drop the ball quite with DNC/GNB weapons (TEA being, imo, the most egregious), but that it makes sense as to why they did.
Last edited by WhyAmIHere; 02-16-2020 at 06:21 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote


