Quote Originally Posted by Covfefe View Post
TL;DR
You sure go a long way of trying to justify uneven teams.

Quote Originally Posted by Divinemights View Post
Better?
You are referring to the situation where I have to suffer because of people trying to play for PvE Objective in a PvP mode?
Such as calling for a S rank node when this GC only need 50 more points to win?
Better?
I would rather to have the original pvp community size
Situations like that can very much happen for an opposing team.

It's now random. It can happen to you, it can happen to others.

Quote Originally Posted by BloodRubyXII View Post
Pretty much, Adders dominated for the first few weeks of Onsal, and then like what happened to Maelstrom, started tanking hard because loads of leeches went to Adders to get carried to easier wins, which in turn meant Flames and Mael were able to get a lot of games back from them. To cap it off, Adders obviously had longer queues times (which some adders players circumvented by queueing freelance just so they could play, even if it meant a loss) and because people had swapped to them, they were stuck there, which freed up a lot of good players to swap OUT of Adders, and the cycle would have continued if forced freelancer wasn't a thing. In like the last 2 weeks of GCs meaning anything before forced freelancer, Flames were absolutely murdering Adders on Light. Like before forced freelancer, my winrate was actually better on Flames in FLs than it has been since the change, even though statistically we've always been one of the worst GCs with the few players that are half good at PvP turning freelancer on.
So keep track of which GC is dominating on what data center? Feels like too much of a hassle and a lot of uneven matches. Force Freelancer and be done with it. (what they did).