Quote Originally Posted by Coglin View Post
How so? I disagreed, which I still do. Then pointed out that with practice, anyone can adjust to it. I know I did, in leveling my casters up in AoE nuking parties, and I dealt with it in my expereince with the exact content he pointed out, only I had not completed it. Which he then claimed made my opinion invalid. He did so specifically by name and reference. I made a general comment. Yet you assume to tell me I am the the troll who misinterpreted.

What I do find interesting, is that you will make post that are 100% off topic to state your opinion of one of two people debating here, by picking sides, and assistince on targeting an individual, while making absolutely no comments that are related to the subject topic. Yet claim it others are comming off trollish.
Actually, go back and read it: I never said it invalidated you. I merely stated (quite accurately) that it devalued your opinion because you had yet to complete it - possibly even because of what we are talking about. I even explained that not completing content specifically does not invalidate, rather that it lends itself to being less weighty than the opinion of those who have. Coglin, I think you are skimming and not actually reading what's been said which is entirely the problem here. In fact, you actually indicated this just a couple posts ago.

I am entirely too lazy to cut and paste every part of the conversation to illustrate this.

And nobody has said that your opinion is wrong - it is an opinion about a subjective topic. It's the great thing about these boards - people can post and agree/disagree, etc.. But you really have swung and missed a handful of times now. Nobody is targeting you - they're just trying to redirect you to the parts that you keep missing over or misinterpreting.