If this gaming community is so tolerant of toxic behavior, this is also a problem.
We don't know what happened so we don't know that the behavior was rude let alone toxic.
Could it be you were overly sensitive to whatever happened?
Again, we don't know. We weren't there. We do know that the rest of the group didn't agree with you.
It`s simple. If someone says to you «You 're an idiot» or «*** you» will you be insensitive? Or (different people have different kinks) do you like it? Maybe in some culture these are polite words? Let me doubt on this point.
Of course, it`s possible not to believe in examples of unsuccessful communication with mentors (not by the players fault). But it works both ways.Thus, evidence about good and understanding mentors can be questionable. Because... «Again, we don't know. We weren't there»© Sophists invented these techniques a long time ago.
It would be more reasonable to proceed from the thesis "there are non-toxic mentors, but there are toxic and indifferent mentors - this is a problem." There are problems in the system. What decisions? This is a real topic of discussion. Single reports on rough mentors, as said above, do not give results.
Last edited by Tamhas; 02-04-2020 at 02:26 AM.
I mean, if basic reporting of bad actors is overall being ignored by SE, what makes any of you people think suggesting improvements to the commendation system will ever be heard or implemented? Sounds to me like people are shouting into the wind a bit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.