From the start there were no set policies on what was expected of a mentor in both action and behavior. No overseers assigned to make sure their group of mentors met certain goals and guidelines. No real qualifications were ever put in place other than comms and having an expected level achievements. No test of one's knowledge and ability before becoming a mentor. No great incentive to work towards.

Just throw a group of people in one large linkshell and let the pot boil is what it's come down to. Not only are there a bunch of mentors who's behavior is toxic, but this sets a bad example for those upcoming novice who may one day become mentors themselves.

They need to scrap this so called mentor program that's become a cesspool as it stands. Maybe start smaller groups of mentors, and not put everyone in one large linkshell. Find a way to separate the good from the bad. Yes and have one Senior mentor oversee their one smaller group. Maybe make an app for filling out weekly requirements by mentors and those that don't meet those requirement risk losing their status as mentor. Give better incentives for being a mentor. Reward for good behavior and stop rewarding for bad behavior as well. There are many things they could do to make this program far better than what it is.