ADD GLAMOUR EFFECTS SETTINGS

[Aurida]

Oh I've got an idea to make this good! You get two settings for it, right? One that's as current, and then another that automatically puts every player character into their class's artifact gear depending on level bracket.

So looking at a Paladin they'd be in the AF1 from levels 50 to 59, the AF2 from 60 to 69, the AF3 from 70 to 79, and then the AF4 at 80. The only thing of the character in question it takes into account is whether headgear is set visible or weapons display while not drawn.

As for before level 50, or for classes without all the sets of artifact armor, I dunno. Could just give them the hall of the novice sets from 1-29 and the Brayflox set from 30-49?

But setting on this 'immersion mode' would be a valid option for people who care about job identity, letting them undo all the glamour restrictions in the game right now for the rest of us who actually engage with the system.

[CrimsonGunner]

Oh I've got an idea to make this good! You get two settings for it, right? One that's as current, and then another that automatically puts every player character into their class's artifact gear depending on level bracket.

So looking at a Paladin they'd be in the AF1 from levels 50 to 59, the AF2 from 60 to 69, the AF3 from 70 to 79, and then the AF4 at 80. The only thing of the character in question it takes into account is whether headgear is set visible or weapons display while not drawn.

As for before level 50, or for classes without all the sets of artifact armor, I dunno. Could just give them the hall of the novice sets from 1-29 and the Brayflox set from 30-49?

But setting on this 'immersion mode' would be a valid option for people who care about job identity, letting them undo all the glamour restrictions in the game right now for the rest of us who actually engage with the system.

or simply make a setting that disable the glamour option and show what that person actually wearing?(which is what the OP is basically saying and not asking a full on censorship mode that changes what that person is wearing regardless of his equipment)

[Iscah]

no need to become so hostile and even that defensive about glamour, the op has a solid point.
if he doesn't want to see those kind of things ,he should have the option in game to turn it off.

In a single-player game? Sure.

In a multi-player game where the other characters are real people who chose what they wanted their character to wear? Not so much.

You can't control what other people wear in the real world either. Just look the other way.

Oh I've got an idea to make this good! You get two settings for it, right? One that's as current, and then another that automatically puts every player character into their class's artifact gear depending on level bracket.

So people can put me in lovely "immersive" things like the female dragoon armour and healer robes with miniskirts and frilly panties underneath? No thankyou.

I put a lot of effort into picking things that suit my characters and my taste of what is and isn't suitable for them to wear - whether it's avoiding things that are "too revealing" or just not the sort of thing that looks right on them.

or simply make a setting that disable the glamour option and show what that person actually wearing?(which is what the OP is basically saying and not asking a full on censorship mode that changes what that person is wearing regardless of his equipment)

Do you realise how disastrous unglamoured gear combinations can look, though?

Unless someone is wearing a complete set of gear, it tends to look like a mismatched disaster. (And even with a complete set, again they are often more revealing than what I've glamoured over it.)

My Lv60 RDM is wearing a top hat and feathered crop top. My Lv80 WHM is wearing a black gothic dress and chunky gold Ronkan arm and leg gear. My dancer is wearing something that might work for MCH but isn't remotely dance wear.

Real gear isn't coordinated to match other gear. It doesn't have to, because we have glamours to fix that.

[SeedSix]

Yes, that is what I was driving at.